Effects of airflow on thermal comfort before sleep onset in a Warm and Humid climate

Minlin Zhu,Ouyang Qin,Henggen Shen,Yingxin Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39584-0_15

2014-01-01

Abstract:Fans are widely used in southeast of China to increase heat loss day and night in summer time. However, all-night rotating speed control system, which can produce sleep-friendly airflow, has not been proposed under rigorous human experimental results. Sleeping mode, nowadays, prevailing on the market, are figured out by testing, to be a variant of the simulated natural wind model which is a beta product in the laboratory, thus the so-called sleeping fans are likely to cause rheumatic pain or even temporary paralysis after all-night usage. In this study, customs of using fans during the sleep by Chinese people from different regions and ages are collected through an Internet survey distributed in the summer time. The results of the survey show the necessity of sleep-friendly airflow, customary fan displacement and the preference to the fan type, which partly become the fundamental settings of the human experiment. The human experiment in this study is a preliminary exploration of the airflow preference preceding sleep initiation, which is based on a theoretically possible interaction level in the circadian regulation of sleep that changes in skin temperature rather than core temperature causally affect sleep propensity, for the reason that airflow not only increases heat loss which causes thermal sensation but also stimulates tactile sensation in the skin. In this part, mechanisms and functions of coupling between sleep and body temperature rhythms are given with some physiological and neurobiological findings which can be seen in abundant researches. In the human experiment, subjects were wearing short pyjamas supine on a bed covered by rattan mat with a towel blanket under the following conditions: air temperature(Ta) 30 degrees C, relative humidity(RH) 60 % and air velocity(V) 0.6, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m/s. Common protocol of subjective evaluation on the effect of airflow is obtained for all subjects. TSV declines with increasing air velocity and arrives at 0.5 when air velocity is around 0.8 m/s, 0.2 m/s lower than that under upright condition. Nearly all subjects prefer the airflow with a constant air velocity to the simulated natural wind with a changeable air velocity. The draft is mainly from too high air velocity and immobile airflow direction.