Subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury
X. F. Yang,L. Wen,J. B. Gong,R. Y. Zhan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0475-2
2009-01-01
Acta Neurochirurgica
Abstract:Dear Editor, Firstly, thanks for the attention on our study. Nowadays, decompressive craniectomy is an important method for the management of patients with severe head trauma, and apparently the prevention and management of complications are crucial parts of this surgical method. Actually, a great part of these complications would be secondary to head trauma or craniotomy as well, including subdural effusion, post-traumatic hydrocephalus, intracranial infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, intracranial rehemorrhage, and epilepsy. Subdural effusion is a complication that could be secondary to both head trauma and craniotomy. The incidence rate of subdural effusion in head trauma was between 7 and 12% [3], and that after decompressive craniectomy was between 21 and 50% reportedly [1, 2, 4, 5]. In our series, this rate was 21.3%. We agree on the explanation of the reasons for the high incidence of subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy from Dr. Cumher Kilincer. However, here we want to emphasize another reason for the development of subdural effusion. We have treated a patient who was transferred to our hospital 2 months after surgical decompression for severe head trauma. The local hospital sent him to our hospital for deterioration of consciousness, and the CT scan disclosed subdural effusion contralateral to the decompressive side (Fig. 1). We reviewed the patient’s medical record, and it was found that though the brain edema was not disclosed from the CT on the late phase of head trauma the treatment of dehydration was still lasted. The excessive dehydration was believed to be an important reason for the development of subdural effusion. After stopping the dehydration, this patient recovered under conservative treatment and the CT approved the resolution of effusion. Such a case may not be the only one, and the development