Electrical stimulation for seizure induction during SEEG exploration: a useful predictor of postoperative seizure recurrence?
Agnes Trebuchon,Renata Racila,Francesco Cardinale,Stanislas Lagarde,Aileen McGonigal,Giorgio Lo Russo,Didier Scavarda,Romain Carron,Roberto Mai,Patrick Chauvel,Fabrice Bartolomei,Stefano Francione
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322469
2020-10-28
Abstract:Objective Direct electrical stimulations of cerebral cortex are a traditional part of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) practice, but their value as a predictive factor for seizure outcome has never been carefully investigated. Patients and method We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 346 patients operated on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy after SEEG exploration. As potential predictors we included: aetiology, MRI data, age of onset, duration of epilepsy, age at surgery, topography of surgery and whether a seizure was induced by either low frequency electrical stimulation (LFS) or high frequency electrical stimulation. Results Of 346 patients, 63.6% had good outcome (no seizure recurrence, Engel I). Univariate analysis demonstrated significant correlation with favourable outcome (Engel I) for: aetiology, positive MRI and seizure induced by stimulation. At multivariate analysis, informative MRI, type II focal cortical dysplasia and tumour reduced the risk of seizure recurrence (SR) by 47%, 58% and 81%, respectively. Compared with the absence of induced seizures, the occurrence of ictal events after LFS significantly predicts a favourable outcome on seizures, with only 44% chance of disabling SR at last follow-up. Conclusion Among the already known predictors outcome, seizure induction by LFS therefore represents a positive predictive factor for seizure outcome after surgery.
surgery,psychiatry,clinical neurology