Abstract:In recent years, the Dempster–Shafer Theory (DST) has been widely applied in areas such as target classification and multi-modal fusion due to its advantages in uncertain reasoning. However, in DST, when there exists highly conflicts between Sources of Evidence (SoEs), it often leads to counterintuitive fusion results, thereby affecting the performance of the final fused decision-making. To eliminate the potential impact of highly conflicts during the fusion process, this paper primarily focuses on modifying the SoEs themselves to achieve the discounting fusion. Currently, existing literature has proposed numerous discounting fusion methods to address highly conflict fusion. However, in these discounting strategies, the determination of discounting factors is typically based on a single criterion. Considering that a single indicator cannot comprehensively and accurately assess the reliability of each evidence source, this paper introduces a novel conflict evidence combination method based on a multi-criteria evaluation strategy. In this method, the Best and Worst Method (BWM) is initially used to prioritize the best SoE, determining the solution points for each criterion and subsequently selecting the ideal solution. Then, combining the selected criteria: distance, relative entropy, and divergence metrics, reliability calculation is performed based on the Stable Preference Order Theory for Ideal Solution (SPOTIS), which achieves a stable preference order strategy towards the ideal solutions. Finally, leveraging the discounting fusion method in DST, modification and fusion of the original highly conflict SoEs are achieved. Through extensive experiments, the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method in this paper have been validated.

Approach for grey fuzzy MADA in closed world

Sensor Data Fusion Based on a New Conflict Measure

A New Approach for Grey Multi-Attribute Decision Making

Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Rough Set and Evidence Theory

Efficient Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence

An Evidence Combination Approach Based on Fuzzy Discounting

A novel multi-criteria conflict evidence combination method and its application to pattern recognition

Analysis and Extension of the Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis with Uncertainty

New Method for Measuring the Degree of Conflict among General Basic Probability Assignments

A conflict evidence fusion method based on the composite discount factor and the game theory

A normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy MABAC method based on CCSD and prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making

A New Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Using the Dice Similarity Measure under Fermatean Fuzzy Environments

Three-way group decisions using evidence theory under hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment

An DSmT Approximate Reasoning Method on the Condition of Non-zero Multiple Focal Elements

Grey Absolute Decision Analysis (GADA) Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making Under Uncertainty

A Conflict Evidence Fusion Method Based on Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity and the Belief Entropy

Multi-Module Decision Fusion in Operational Status Monitoring

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

The Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Making Problem with Incomplete Decision Matrix

Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Approach Integrating Subjective and Objective Information.

Fast DSmT-DS Approximate Reasoning Method