Abstract:The interspecific relationships between 3 invasive plants and 10 native plants. >0 meant that the native plant took competitive superiority in the mixture, while <0 meant the invasive plant took competitive superiority in the mixture. Invasive plants exert significant ecological impacts on native plants, communities, and ecosystems. However, consistent conclusions regarding how traits of invasive plants, native plants, and their divergences affect invasion dynamics are still lacking. Here, we conducted a pairwise common garden experiment to investigate how invasion was influenced not only by invasive plants but also by native plants, aiming to elucidate the role of invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, and their divergences in invasion processes. Our findings revealed variations in invasive stage depending on the combinations of invasive and native plants. Specifically, native plants such as A. argyi, A. lavandulifolia, and C. album exhibited competitive superiority when co‐occurring with the three invasive plants. S. viridis, A. vestita, and A. annua had competitive superiority when they co‐occurred with E. canadensis, G. quadriradiata, and E. annuus respectively. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the competitive abilities of invasive plants were primarily influenced by factors such as height, diameter, and biomass allocation, while native plants' competitive abilities were mainly affected by diameter, biomass allocation, and function group differences. Moreover, our analysis revealed that invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, their divergences, and their interactions together explained 36.88% of the variation in invasion dynamics, with invasive‐plant traits and the native‐plant traits explaining 10.19% and 6.88%, respectively. In conclusion, the traits of invasive and native plants, along with their divergences, significantly influence interspecific relationships, and influencing the invasive stages. Divergences in competitive strategies between the native plants and invasive plants facilitated invasion processes. Our study not only contributes to understanding the mechanisms underlying invasion, but also provides a scientific foundation for predicting and managing the negative effects of invasive plants.

Increased Compensatory Ability of an Invasive Plant to Above- and Below-Ground Enemies in Monocultures

History of Exposure to Herbivores Increases the Compensatory Ability of an Invasive Plant

Differences in Interactions of Aboveground and Belowground Herbivores on the Invasive Plant Alternanthera Philoxeroides and Native Host A. Sessilis

Plant invasions facilitated by suppression of root nutrient acquisition rather than by disruption of mycorrhizal association in the native plant

An invasive plant rapidly increased the similarity of soil fungal pathogen communities

Positive Feedback Between Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plants Influences Plant Invasion Success and Resistance to Invasion

Differing Interactions Between an Introduced Beetle and a Resident Root Nematode Mediated by an Invasive Plant and Its Native Congener

Responses of Soil Microbial Community Size, Respiration Rate and Functional Diversity to Invasive Plant Species Richness

Effects of Above-and Below-Ground Herbivore Interactions on Interspecific Relationship Between the Invasive Plant Alternanthera Philoxeroides and Its Native Congener Alternanthera Sessilis

An Invading Annual Plant Benefits Less from Soil Biota and Has Reduced Competitive Power with a Resident Grass

Invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, and their divergences as invasion factors

No Impact of a Native Beetle on Exotic Plant Performance and Competitive Ability Due to Plant Compensation

Increased dependence on nitrogen-fixation of a native legume in competition with an invasive plant

Density-dependent Interactions Between the Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita and the Biological Control Agent Agasicles Hygrophila on Invasive Alternanthera Philoxeroides and Its Native Congener Alternantera Sessilis

Effects of Warming and Nitrogen on Above- and Below-Ground Herbivory of an Exotic Invasive Plant and Its Native Congener

Stronger mutualistic interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help Asteraceae invaders outcompete the phylogenetically related natives

Competitive ability, not tolerance, may explain success of invasive plants over natives

Herbivory and elevated levels of CO2 and nutrients separately, rather than synergistically, impacted biomass production and allocation in invasive and native plant species

Aboveground herbivory can promote exotic plant invasion through intra‐ and interspecific aboveground‐belowground interactions

The Invasive Stoloniferous Clonal Plant Alternanthera Philoxeroides Outperforms Its Co-Occurring Non-Invasive Functional Counterparts in Heterogeneous Soil Environments – Invasion Implications

Opposing effects of soil biota on a native plant shoot and root growth in the presence of a invasive competitor