Tetraethylammonium difluoro(oxalato)borate as electrolyte salt for electrochemical double-layer capacitors
Yanqing Lai,Xujie Chen,Zhian Zhang,Jie Li,Yexiang Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.136
IF: 6.6
2011-01-01
Electrochimica Acta
Abstract:Difluoro(oxalato)borate (ODFB − ) is a less symmetric borate anion, which makes it possible to increase the solubility of tetraethylammonium (TEA + ) salt in propylene carbonate (PC) and improve the capacitance of electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs). The use of TEAODFB with PC solvent in EDLCs was investigated in the paper. The results show that TEAODFB has good solubility in PC, and the conductivity is comparable to TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte. When the molar concentration of TEAODFB reaches to 1.6 M, the TEAODFB/PC electrolyte has superior conductivity of 14.46 mS cm −1 and good capacitor characteristics. Despite the less accessible to the electrode and low energy density was achieved, the specific capacitance of 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte is 21.4 F g −1 at 1 A g −1 , and the energy density and power density were comparable to 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte at 1–5 A g −1 . Temperature characteristic was also tested by 3.3 F circular capacitors from −40 to 60 °C, the result demonstrates that capacitors using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte show much higher capacitance and energy density at the investigated temperatures, and the discharge capacitance of capacitors using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte varies with the temperature less than that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte. Keywords Electrochemical double-layer capacitor Electrolyte Less symmetric borate Difluoro(oxalato)borate Chain carbonate 1 Introduction Electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs, also called super capacitors or ultra capacitors) have been paid much attention over the last decade due to their high power density and high number of charge–discharge cycles [1,2] . They are widely used in the fields of IT equipments, back-up memories, and transportations such as hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) [3,4] . However, their energy density is much lower compared to batteries [5,6] . Many efforts have been taken to improve the energy density of EDLCs [7–9] . The electrolyte is extremely important for EDLCs, as it determines the capacitance, internal resistance and temperature characteristic of EDLCs. Currently, the most favorable electrolyte salt is tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEABF 4 ). TEABF 4 salt demonstrates excellent conductivity in acetonitrile (AN) solvent, however, as AN is volatile and environmentally critical, its application is restricted. Alkyl carbonates as solvents are greener, but TEABF 4 salt has poor solubility in alkyl carbonates, which is only about 1 M in PC [10–13] , even lower in other carbonates [12] . The properties of TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte have been reported systematically [14–16] . For EDLCs using TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte, the energy density is limited by the number of ions available for the formation of the double layer or the concentration of salt in the electrolyte [17] . The use of less symmetric ion as a counter anion can decrease the crystal lattice energy of the electrolyte and increase the degree of ionic dissociation, then further improve the solubility of the salt in alkyl carbonates, such salts have received much attention in recent years [9,18–21] . Tetraethylammonium difluoro(oxalato)borate (TEAODFB, Scheme 1 ) is a quaternary ammonium salt with lower local symmetry of the borate anion compared with TEABF 4 , and its melting point is only about 33 °C, which is much lower than that of TEABF 4 (382 °C). Gores et al. [22] synthesised TEAODFB and characterised it by physicochemical measurements (TGA, DSC, viscosity and conductivity), then prepared composite electrolyte by adding 0.1 M TEAODFB to 1.0 M TEABF 4 /AN, and tested electrochemical stability of the electrolyte by CV under the three-electrodes system (glassy carbon as working electrode, platinum plate as counter electrode and Ag/Ag + as reference electrode). In this paper, we reported the use of TEAODFB as a unique electrolyte salt in EDLCs. The electrolyte conductivities, charging–discharging performances, temperature characteristics, cyclic voltammetry and AC impedance of TEAODFB/PC electrolyte in EDLCs were first reported. 2 Experimental 2.1 Preparation of TEAODFB TEAODFB was synthesised as following [22] . TEABF 4 and anhydrous oxalic acid were added to acetonitrile (AN). After the materials were dissolved by electromagnetic mixing, SiCl 4 was added to the mixture and colorless crystals emerged at low temperature. The product was determined by means of 1 H, 19 F, 11 B and 13 C NMR spectroscopy (AVANCE400) and infrared spectrum (IR) (Spectrum One). The water content of AN, anhydrous oxalic acid and TEABF 4 were lower than 20 ppm, as determined by Mettler Toledo DL32 titrator. 2.2 Preparation of electrolytes and capacitors The preparation of electrolytes was carried out in an argon-filled glove box (Universal 2440/750, Mikrouna Mech. Tech. Co., Ltd. Water content: <1 ppm, oxygen content: <1 ppm). Electrolyte conductivities of electrolyte solutions were measured from 0 °C to 40 °C by use of a conductometer (SG3, METTLER TOLEDO). The activated carbon electrodes were prepared by mixing 80 wt% activated carbon (Kuraray Co., Ltd. average surface area: 1635 m 2 g −1 ; total pore volume: 0.8316 cm 3 g −1 ; H.K pore volume: 0.6939 cm 3 g −1 ; BJH pore volume: 0.1490 cm 3 g −1 ; average pore size: 1.88 nm; determined by nitrogen adsorption porosimetry measurement (Autosorb); median particle diameter D50: 4.8 μm; determined by laser particle analysis (MASTERSIZER Microplus)), 10 wt% acetylene black as the conductor, and 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as the binder, followed by coating on etched Al foils with a 30 μm thickness as current collectors. The electrodes were punched into small disks with 8 mm diameter and dried at 120 °C under vacuum for 12 h prior to be used. The EDLCs for charging–discharging experiments were fabricated with two symmetric electrodes in the argon-filled glove box, a separator (TF4050) was sandwiched between the two electrodes. 3.3 F circular capacitors were also made for temperature characteristic test in Hunan Yeshine Kingco New Energy Co., Ltd. 1 M TEABF 4 /PC and 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolytes were used. 2.3 Measurement of electrochemistry performance The performance of the capacitors was investigated with a charge–discharge unit (Land, China). The EDLCs were charged and discharged in CC mode, with the cell potential ranged from 0 to 2.5 V. The high and low temperature characteristics were studied in a high–low temperature test-chamber (GDH-2005C). The temperature characteristics were tested with constant current of 20 mA within 0–2.5 V. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and AC impedance measurements were conducted with PARSTAT 2273 electrochemical measurement system (PerkinElmer instrument, USA) using two-electrode capacitors. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed within 0–2.5 V with scan rates of 10 mV s −1 , 30 mV s −1 and 50 mV s −1 , respectively. The frequency of AC impedance ranged from 100 kHz to 20 mHz. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Electrolyte properties The electrolyte conductivity κ is of practical importance to electrolyte properties. It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the electrolyte conductivity increased with increasing temperature for all electrolytes, and the conductivity of 1 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte was lower than for 1 M TEABF 4 /PC. However, the solubility of TEAODFB in PC is around 2 M at 25 °C, which is much higher compared with TEABF 4 . This attributes to the larger van der Waals volume of ODFB − than that of BF 4 − , and the crystal lattice energy of the salt may be lower, hence the solubility of the salt increases dramatically [19] . When the molar concentration of TEAODFB increased to 1.2 M, the electrolyte conductivities of TEAODFB/PC electrolytes were superior. The electrolyte conductivity is dominantly determined by ion association and viscosity, that in low viscosity situations, with the concentration increasing, the number of the free electrolyte ions increases, hence the conductivity increases; while the concentration increases to some extent, the viscosity plays a decisive role in determining the electrolytic conductivity, and the conductivity decreases. It can be seen obviously from Fig. 1 that the conductivity of TEAODFB/PC electrolyte initially increased with molar concentration and then decreased when the concentration increased to 1.8 M, the maximal electrolyte conductivity was observed near 1.6 M at 25 °C (about 14.46 mS cm −1 ), which was superior to that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte (around 12.94 mS cm −1 ). 3.2 Charging–discharging performances To ascertain the feasibility of TEAODFB/PC electrolyte for EDLC, constant-current charge–discharge experiments based on two-electrode system were carried out, and the capacitance was calculated at 0 (2.5-IR) V from the slope of the discharge curve according to the following equation (1) : (1) C = I d V / d t where C is the capacitance of the cell in farad, I is the discharge current in ampere (A) and dV / dt is the slope in volt per second (V s −1 ). In a symmetrical system where the active material weight is the same for the two electrodes, the total specific capacitance ( C ′) of capacitor, in farad per gram of active material (F g −1 ) was obtained from Eq. (2) : (2) C ′ = C 2 m where 2 m is the mass of dry active carbon (g) in both electrodes, and the single electrode capacitance is four times to the total capacitance. The charging–discharging curves of EDLCs using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte at different current density are shown in Fig. 2 . For ideal electric double-layer capacitor, the charging–discharging curve is symmetrical triangles, representing its good electrochemical reversibility. As shown in Fig. 2 , all curves show the mirror-like symmetric responses when the potentials were between 0 and 2.5 V, which indicates that the EDLC using TEAODFB/PC electrolyte exhibits an ideal capacitive behavior. It is also noted that with the current density increased, the IR drop rapidly increased and the charge–discharge time decreased. The IR drop attributes to the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of EDLC which arises from the resistance of both the electrolyte and the AC electrodes. According to Eq. (2) , the specific capacitance with the electrolyte at 1 A g −1 was 21.4 F g −1 , and the result was superior to 1 M TEABF 4 /PC at low current density, which was 19.6 F g −1 at 1 A g −1 . It is indicated that the average specific capacitance decreased with current intensity increased, with 18.8 F g −1 and 13.4 F g −1 at 3 A g −1 and 5 A g −1 , respectively. The energy density of the capacitor was also examined against power density, which is represented as the Ragone relationship at various current densities from 1 A g −1 to 5 A g −1 as shown in Fig. 3 . The energy density was calculated based on the mass of active electrode material. The energy densities was calculated from the formula E = 0.5 CU 2 / m , where U is the cell potential omitting IR drop (2.5-IR). The power density was obtained from P = E / t , where t is the time duration for the capacitor to discharge from 2.5 to 0 V. The data in Fig. 3 demonstrated that the capacitor using TEAODFB/PC had comparable characteristics in terms of energy density and power density to the TEABF 4 /PC systems. However, the energy density reduced dramatically at high power densities for the PC-based system used. 3.3 Temperature characteristic To check the temperature characteristic of the TEAODFB/PC electrolyte, 3.3 F capacitors were used for testing at −40 °C, −20 °C, 0 °C, 20 °C, 40 °C and 60 °C for 2000 cycles, respectively. The temperature characteristic of 3.3 F capacitors with TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte was also investigated. Fig. 4 shows the discharge capacitance and the energy density of EDLCs at various temperatures containing the two electrolytes. As it can be seen, for the two electrolytes, the discharge capacitance was much superior to the designed capacitance above −20 °C, and at 20 °C, the capacitance was maximal. The discharge capacitance obtained with 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte was much higher than that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte except at −40 °C. At −40 °C, the capacitance was very low for the viscous solvent PC used. In the low temperature area of −40 to 20 °C, the capacitance increased along with the increase of temperature, and in the high temperature area of 20–60 °C, the capacitance decreased along with the increase of temperature. Above −20 °C, the discharge capacitance of 3.3 F capacitor using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte varied with the temperature less than that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte. The results show that TEAODFB/PC electrolyte has excellent temperature characteristic. The energy density based on the total mass of the capacitor was also calculated, the value was ∼2.0 Wh kg −1 for capacitor using TEAODFB/PC electrolyte. 3.4 Cyclic voltammetry and impedance behavior To obtain the information about the rate behavior of EDLC using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte, cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were recorded at three different scan rates (10, 30 and 50 mV s −1 , respectively). Fig. 5 shows the CVs of EDLC with 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte at different scan rates, where no significant decomposition of cations and anions was proceeded. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the responding current increased almost the same with the scan rate, and with the increasing of the scan rate, it was more deflective from rectangular shape, which due partly to the use of the solvent PC and its high viscosity compared to other solvents such as AN causes the late withdrawal of adsorbed ion on the double layer interfaces [23] and partly to the larger molar volume of ODFB − anion. It can be obtained values of about 20.6 F g −1 , 13.7 F g −1 , 12.1 F g −1 , respectively, as determined by means of CV based on the total weight of active material in the two electrodes. The results indicate the obtained capacitance shows some dependence on the potential scan rate, suggesting that the accessibility of the electrolyte to the activated carbon is not so good when the scan rate was increased. In order to explain the influence of the electrolyte to the inner resistance and capacitance behavior of EDLC, the AC impedance responses of the EDLCs with 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte and 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte at 2.5 V before cycling were applied and shown as Nyquist plots in Fig. 6 (a). The plots consist of a distorted semicircle in the high frequency region and a straight line in the low frequency region. The high frequency intercept of the semicircle on the real axis provides the value of the solution resistance and the diameter of the semicircle is equal to the resistance which arises from the charge transfer resistance in the interface of electrolyte and electrode. It can be seen from Fig. 6 (a) the plots show typical EDLC behavior and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) value of 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte was smaller, which indicates that the conductivity of 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte is higher. In order to fit to impedance spectra of the electrolytes, an equivalent circuit can be suggested in Fig. 6 (b) [24,25] . In this circuit, R s is the solution resistance, R ct is interpreted as the charge transfer resistance, CPE is a constant phase element, C ad is related to the adsorption capacitance, W represents the Warburg impedance associated with the inclined line in the low frequency. Table 1 lists the fitting values of EDLCs with the two electrolytes obtained by the simulation of impedance spectra in Fig. 6 (a). It can be seen from Table 1 that the R ct of using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte was higher than that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte at 2.5 V, which probably attributes to the migration of ODFB − ion is of difficulty. The lower value of C ad with 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte indicated that the stronger adsorption of ODFB − anions in PC solvent at the electrode than that of BF 4 − . The Warburg impedance of EDLC using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte was also higher, corresponding to the straight line in the low frequency was not as vertical as that obtained from 1 M TEABF 4 /PC electrolyte. For ideal EDLC, in the low-frequency region the plots align vertically and the vertical degree suggests the capacitive behavior of the EDLC. Non-vertical linear shape of Nyquist plots using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte indicates the diffusional barriers of the electrolyte penetration into the electrode, and this probably due to the van der Waals volume of the ODFB − is larger than that of BF 4 − . 4 Conclusions TEAODFB shows higher solubility in PC solvent compared with TEABF 4 (1 M). 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC has the highest conductivity of 14.46 mS cm −1 at 25 °C, while only 12.94 mS cm −1 for 1 M TEABF 4 /PC. The CV and AC impedance tests indicated that the accessibility of TEAODFB/PC electrolyte to the electrode was not so well due to the larger van der Waals volume of ODFB − . Nevertheless, the specific capacitance was 21.4 F g −1 at 1 A g −1 using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC in EDLCs, while 19.6 F g −1 for 1 M TEABF 4 /PC. Although the capacitance and the energy density of capacitors using 1.6 M TEAODFB/PC electrolyte were low, they were much higher than that of 1 M TEABF 4 /PC from −20 to 60 °C. The results indicated TEAODFB had some potential of improving the capacitance of EDLCs. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2007BAE12B00) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20803095), and acknowledge Hunan Yeshine Kingco New Energy Co., Ltd. for the fabrication of 3.3 F capacitor. References [1] R. Kötz M. Carlen Electrochim. Acta 45 2000 2483 [2] M. Inagaki H. Konno O. Tanaike J. Power Sources 195 2010 7880 [3] P. Sharma T.S. Bhatti Energy Convers. Manage. 51 2010 2901 [4] N. Omar J. Van Mierlo B. Verbrugge P. Van den Bossche Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 7524 [5] A. Burke Electrochim. Acta 53 2007 1083 [6] A. Lewandowski M. Galinski J. Power Sources 173 2007 822 [7] B. Zhang J. Liang C.L. Xu B.Q. Wei D.B. Ruan D.H. Wu Mater. Lett. 51 2001 539 [8] S.R.S. Prabaharan R. Vimala Z. Zainal J. Power Sources 161 2006 730 [9] T. Devarajan S. Higashiya C. Dangler M. Rane-Fondacaro J. Snyder P. Haldar Electrochem. Commun. 11 2009 680 [10] C. Zhang D. Long B. Xing W. Qiao R. Zhang L. Zhan X. Liang L. Ling Electrochem. Commun. 10 2008 1809 [11] M. Ue M. Takeda M. Takehara S. Mori J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 1997 2684 [12] K. Chiba T. Ueda H. Yamamoto Electrochemistry 75 2007 668 [13] K. Xu M.S. Ding T.R. Jow J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 2001 A267 [14] M. Ue Electrochemistry 75 2007 565 [15] M.S. Ding T.R. Jow J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 2004 A2007 [16] N. Nanbu T. Ebina H. Uno S. Ishizawa Y. Sasaki Electrochim. Acta 52 2006 1763 [17] J.P. Zheng J. Huang T.R. Jow J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 1997 2026 [18] G.-h. Sun K.-x. Li C.-g. Sun J. Power Sources 162 2006 1444 [19] N. Nanbu K. Suzuki T. Ebina H. Uno Y. Sasaki Electrochemistry 75 2007 615 [20] N. Nanbu T. Ebina H. Uno Y. Miyazaki Y. Sasaki Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9 2006 A482 [21] N. Nanbu K. Suzuki N. Yagi M. Sugahara M. Takehara M. Ue Y. Sasaki Electrochemistry 75 2007 607 [22] T. Herzig C. Schreiner D. Gerhard P. Wasserscheid H.J. Gores J. Fluorine Chem. 128 2007 612 [23] M. Arulepp L. Permann J. Leis A. Perkson K. Rumma A. Jänes E. Lust J. Power Sources 133 2004 320 [24] G. Nurk A. Jänes K. Lust E. Lust J. Electroanal. Chem. 515 2001 17 [25] A. Jänes L. Permann M. Arulepp E. Lust J. Electroanal. Chem. 569 2004 257