Lyα Equivalent Width Distribution of Lyα Emitting Galaxies at Redshift Z ∼ 4.5

Zhen-Ya Zheng,Jun-Xian Wang,Sangeeta Malhotra,James E. Rhoads,Steven L. Finkelstein,Keely Finkelstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu054
IF: 4.8
2014-01-01
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:Ly alpha line equivalent widths (EWs) provide important clues to the physical nature of high-redshift Lyman alpha emitters (LAEs). However, measuring the Ly alpha EW distribution of high-z narrow-band-selected LAEs can be hard because many sources do not have well-measured broad-band photometry. We investigate the possible biases in measuring the intrinsic Ly alpha EW distribution for a LAE sample at z similar to 4.5 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (ECDFS). We show that our source selection procedures produce only weak Eddington type bias in both the intrinsic Ly alpha luminosity function and the Ly alpha EW distribution. However, the observed EW distribution is severely biased if one only considers LAEs with detections in the continuum. Taking the broad-band non-detections into account requires fitting the distribution of the broad-band-to-narrow-band ratio, which then gives a larger EW distribution scale length. Assuming an exponential form of the intrinsic Ly alpha EW distribution dN/dEW = N exp(-EW/W0), we obtain W-0 = 167(-19)(+44) angstrom (uncorrected for IGM absorption of Ly alpha, and sigma(g) = 160(-12)(+43) angstrom for a Gaussian EW distribution). We discuss the likely range of IGM absorption effects in light of recent measurements of Ly alpha line profiles and velocity offsets. Our data are consistent with Ly alpha EW being independent of UV luminosity (i.e. we do not see evidence for the 'Ando' effect). Our simulations also imply that broad-band images should be 0.5-1 mag deeper than narrow-band images for an effective and reasonably complete LAE survey. Comparing with consistent measurements at other redshifts, we see a strong evolution in Ly alpha EW distribution with redshift which goes as a power-law form of W-0 proportional to (1 + z)(xi), with xi = 1.1 +/- 0.1 (0.6 +/- 0.1) if no IGM corrections are applied to the Ly alpha line; or xi = 1.7 +/- 0.1 (1.2 +/- 0.1) after applying a maximal IGM-absorption correction to Ly alpha line for an exponential (a Gaussian) EW distribution from z = 0.3 to 6.5.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?