Isokinetic assessment of hip abductor in patients with knee osteoarthritis

王剑雄,周谋望,吴同绚,丛卉,宫萍,李筱雯,付桂敏,杨延砚

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2013.12.006

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the differences in isokinetic strength of hip abductor in patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA). Method: Twenty-three patients with diagnosis of bilateral KOA and 14 matched controls participated in the study. Isokinetic test of hip abductor for all the participators were tested by using Biodex system 4, and the test velocities were 30°/s and 60°/s. Using paired-sample t test and independent-sample t test respectively the isokinetic strength were compared between the mainly involved limbs and the contralateral limbs in patients, and between the mainly involved limbs in patients and the control group. Result: In patients with KOA, at 30°/s, the peak torque of hip abductor of the mainly involved limbs was ob- servably lower than that of the contralateral limbs(1.15 vs 1.22Nm/kg, P=0.039), and there were significant dif- ferences in average peak torque and max repeat total work between the mainly involved limbs and the contra- lateral limbs, but there was no significant difference in total work and average power. At 60°/s, the peak torque of the mainly involved limbs was observably lower than that of the contralateral limbs(1.03 vs 1.13Nm/ kg, P=0.006), and there were significant difference, in the average peak torque, max repeat total work, total work and average power. At 30°/s there was no significant difference in peak torque of hip abductor between the groups(1.15 vs 1.35 Nm/kg, P=0.056), but there were remarkably differences in average peak torque, aver- age power, max repeat total work, total work(P≤0.05). At 60°/s only the peak torque of hip abductor in patients with KOA was observably lower than control group(1.03 vs 1.25Nm/kg, P=0.032). Conclusion: Patients with KOA exhibited lower peak torque, work capacity and efficiency of hip abductor of the mainly involved limbs than the contralateral limbs, and exhibited lower peak torque, work capacity and effi- ciency of hip abductor than healthy controls.