Three Different Bacterial Detection Systems for Platelet Concentrates under Inter-Laboratory Conditions.

Bian GuoHui,Yang Chunhui,He Miao,Wang Hong,Liu Jiaxin,Cao Ye,Yang Hong,Liu Zhong,Li Wuping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.029
IF: 2.596
2013-01-01
Transfusion and Apheresis Science
Abstract:Background: A variety of screening methods are currently used worldwide in order to decrease the risk of transfusion-transmitted sepsis and improve the safety of PCs.Methods/materials: PCs inoculated with five different transfusion-relevant species of bacteria at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 colony-forming units (CFU) ml(-1) were stored at 22 degrees C for 7 days. Flow cytometry (FACS), BacT/Alert automated culturing, and a quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) were then used to detect the presence of bacteria in samples prepared from these PCs.Results: At the initial spiking concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 CFU ml(-1), Q-PCR detected all five bacterial species tested. Screening with the BacT/Alert culture-based system allowed bacterial detection (inoculated on day 0) within a mean time of 15.13 h for all three spiking concentrations. Using FACS, positive signals were obtained for all three concentrations of Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus on day 1 and for initial spiking concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus of 1 CFU ml(-1) on day 2. For Staphylococcus epidermidis, detection of an initial inoculum of 1 CFU ml(-1) was possible only beginning on day 6.Conclusion: This study shows that under standard laboratory conditions the sensitivity of FACS in the detection of bacterial contamination of PCs was lower than that of either the BacT/Alert automated culturing method or Q-PCR. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?