Effects of different flaps and preservation of urethral plate on postoperative complication rate following proximal hypospadias repair

张卫星,宋新浩,贾东辉,王瑞,秦俊昌,于波涛,李周,迟凯凯
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2013.06.006
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of different flaps on the postoperative complications following to proximal hypospadia repair. Methods Total of 84 patients with proximal hypospadias were enrolled in the study during July 2008 and November 2011 in our department. They were randomly divided into two groups by using preputial flap or scorotal septum flap, whether preserved urethral plate or not depended on chordee of penis. They were followed up during 1month and 2year after operation for any postoperative complications. Results The follow up study was completed in 62 patients, containing 6 proximal penile and 6 penoscrotal. They were allocated into 2 groups according to different flaps, preputial flaps used in 4 cases and scorotal septum flaps in 28 cases. Compared with that of the scorotal septum flap group, there was a higher risk of urinary fistula in preputial flap group (P <0.05). Patients in AI group had a higher risk of chordee of penis (P <0.05) but lower risk of penile chordee(P <0.05), compared with that of AII group. There was no significant difference in other complication rate among the AI, AII, BI and BII group. Conclusion It has a higher risk of urinary fistula to use preputial flap, but the urethral stricture and urinary fistula complications occur frequently in a tube rather the onlay types.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?