Correlation Between ABCD, ABCD2 Scores and Craniocervical Artery Stenosis in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack.

Wen Sun,Jiafei Dai,Yunyun Xiong,Zhixin Huang,Yongkun Li,Wenhua Liu,Wusheng Zhu,Gelin Xu,Xinfeng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353299
IF: 2.4
2013-01-01
European Neurology
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Craniocervical artery stenosis is an important etiology for transient ischemic attack (TIA). We hypothesized ABCD and ABCD2 scores can predict craniocervical artery stenosis in patients with TIA.METHODS:ABCD and ABCD2 scores were calculated in a total of 479 consecutive first-ever TIA patients in Nanjing Stroke Registry Program and compared with angiographic imaging derived from MRI or invasive catheter-based angiography.RESULTS:Overall craniocervical artery (O-CA) stenosis was found in 197 (41.1%) patients. Extracranial craniocervical artery (E-CA) and intracranial craniocervical artery (I-CA) stenosis was found in 101 (21.1%) and 110 (23%) cases, respectively. ABCD and ABCD2 scores with similar accuracy for O-CA (AUCABCD 0.71, AUCABCD2 0.70), E-CA (AUCABCD 0.72, AUCABCD2 0.72) and I-CA stenosis (AUCABCD 0.62, AUCABCD2 0.62) were both independent predictors for various categories of artery stenosis after being adjusted for non-ABCD2 parameters. The cut-off points were equally 4 in both predicting rules. For ABCD, sensitivity was 57.4, 65.3 and 52.7% and specificity 77.0, 70.4 and 67.5% for O-CA/E-CA/I-CA, respectively. For ABCD2, sensitivity was 61.9, 69.3 and 58.2% and specificity 72.3, 65.6 and 63.1%.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with TIA, despite an association between ABCD and ABCD2 scores and underlying craniocervical artery stenosis, the clinical utility was limited by unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?