The Efficacy and Safety of Nucleos(T)Ide Analogues in the Treatment of Hbv-Related Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis

Yu Shi,Jianqin He,Wei Wu,Jianrong Huang,Yida Yang,Jifang Sheng,Liang Yu,Zhi Chen,Hongyu Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1665-2681(19)30998-6
IF: 3.388
2013-01-01
Annals of Hepatology
Abstract:Introduction. The application of nucleos(t)ide analogues in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has not yet been widely accepted. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies to examine the efficacy and safety of nucleos(t)ide analogues in treating HBV-related ACLF. Material and methods. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies through electronic, and manual searches, and contact with experts. Three-month mortality was defined as the primary efficacy measure. ACLF reactivation and HBV DNA inhibition were secondary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were performed to compare differences between nucleos(t)ide analogue and control groups. Results. Five eligible studies were identified. Antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues led to significant reduction of HBV DNA [HBV DNA reduction > 2 log: 70.4 vs. 29%, RR = 2.29, 95%CI (1.49, 3.53), P < 0.01]. ACLF patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue had significantly lower 3-month mortality [44.8 vs. 73.3%, RR = 0.68, 95%Cl (0.54, 0.84), P < 0.01] as well as incidence of reactivation [1.80 vs. 18.4%, RR = 0.11, 95%Cl (0.03, 0.43), P < 0.01] compared to those who did not. There was no significant difference in the prognosis of patients treated with entecavir or lamivudine [36.4 vs. 40.5%, RR = 0.77, 95%Cl (0.45, 1.32), P = 0.35]. No drug-related adverse events were reported during follow-up. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment reduces short-term mortality as well as reactivation of HBV-related ACLF patients. Nucleos(t)ide analogues are well-tolerated during therapy, and suggestive evidence indicates that entecavir and lamivudine confer comparable short-term benefits in these patients. However, further studies are needed to clarify these observations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?