Comparative Study of the Anatomic Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage I-A Peripheral Lung Cancer by Video Assistant Thoracoscopic Surgery

Lin Zhang,Wei Ma,Yun Li,Yuanzhu Jiang,Guoyuan Ma,Guanghui Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.119121

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the completely thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy with lobectomy to treat stage I-A peripheral lung cancer <= 2 cm.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed that 54 cases stage I-A peripheral lung cancer patients were selected, including 26 cases of segmentectomy and 28 cases of lobectomy. We observed the operative time, blood loss, number of lymphadenectomy, post-operative chest drainage, hospital days, post-operative complications and mortality, post-operative recurrence and 3-year survival rate.Results: There was no significant difference about complications such as post-operative atelectasis, severe pneumonia, arrhythmia and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular in two groups (P > 0.05). The local recurrence rate was not significant different in two groups (P > 0.05). Two groups of operative time, blood loss and number of dissected lymph nodes was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), However, the difference was statistically significant in average chest drainage and less decreased pulmonary function, which led to patients received segmentectomy recovered faster and hospitalized less time (P < 0.05). We also found there was no significant difference on survival rate with 1 and 3 year follow-up of two groups (log-rank Chi-square = 0.028, P > 0.05).Conclusions: For stage I-A peripheral lung cancer, the thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy was safe and effective just as thoracoscopic lobectomy, and furthermore with faster post-operative recovery.