Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Differentiation of Pure Vasogenic Edema and Tumor-Infiltrated Edema in Patients with Peritumoral Edema by Analyzing the Relationship of Axial and Radial Diffusivities on 3.0T MRI

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Peritumoral Edema in Intracranial Tumors Evaluated by Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging

The value of T2 signal intensity in DTI to differentiate between brain tumor infiltration and pure vasogenic edema

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Quantitative Analysis of Permeability for Glioma Grading Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Assessment of Invasion in Peritumoral Edema of Glioma by ~1H-MRS and DTI

Application of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Quantitative Parameters in Grading of Cerebral Glioma on a 3.0T Scanner

Diffusion Weighted Imaging of High Grade Gilomas and Solitary Metastases and Peritumoral Edema

Preliminary Study of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating Diagnosis of High-grade Gliomas and Metastatic Tumors

[Preliminary Study of Astrocytic Tumors by Diffusion Tensor Imaging].

Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases based on multidiffusion MRI model quantitative analysis

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI for the Differentiation of Benign, Intermediate, and Malignant Solid Soft‐tissue Tumors

[Value of Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Peritumoral Edema in the Differential Diagnosis between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma].

Comparison of ADC values of intracranial hemangiopericytomas and angiomatous and anaplastic meningiomas.

Differentiation Between Low-Grade and High-Grade Glioma Using Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging Metrics

The Role of Relative Fractional Anisotropy (rfa) and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ( Radc) in Evaluating Tumor Grade in Gliomas

Axial diffusivity and tensor shape as early markers to assess cerebral white matter damage caused by brain tumors using quantitative diffusion tensor tractography.

Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging to the study of edema in solid and peritumoral areas of glioma

The Differential Diagnosis of Brain Abscess and Necrotic Cystic Glioma with DTI

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Angiomatous Meningioma from Atypical Meningioma