Limited Sampling Strategy Models for Estimating the AUC of Gliclazide in Chinese Healthy Volunteers

Ji-Han Huang,Kun Wang,Xiao-Hui Huang,Ying-Chun He,Lu-Jin Li,Yu-Cheng Sheng,Juan Yang,Qing-Shan Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-012-0096-7
2012-01-01
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
Abstract:The aim of this work is to reduce the cost of required sampling for the estimation of the area under the gliclazide plasma concentration versus time curve within 60 h (AUC0−60t ). The limited sampling strategy (LSS) models were established and validated by the multiple regression model within 4 or fewer gliclazide concentration values. Absolute prediction error (APE), root of mean square error (RMSE) and visual prediction check were used as criterion. The results of Jack-Knife validation showed that 10 (25.0 %) of the 40 LSS based on the regression analysis were not within an APE of 15 % using one concentration–time point. 90.2, 91.5 and 92.4 % of the 40 LSS models were capable of prediction using 2, 3 and 4 points, respectively. Limited sampling strategies were developed and validated for estimating AUC0−60t of gliclazide. This study indicates that the implementation of an 80 mg dosage regimen enabled accurate predictions of AUC0−60t by the LSS model. This study shows that 12, 6, 4, 2 h after administration are the key sampling times. The combination of (12, 2 h), (12, 8, 2 h) or (12, 8, 4, 2 h) can be chosen as sampling hours for predicting AUC0−60t in practical application according to requirement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?