Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in definition of tumor invasion depth staging (T staging) before operation.METHODS:Clinical and radiographic data of 49 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection within two weeks after 3.0 T high-resolution MRI examination without preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Peking University People's Hospital between February 2015 and November 2015 were retrospectively collected. Two radiologists reviewed the MRI imagines and evaluated the location and T staging of rectal cancer independently(radiologist A and B). The kappa statistics was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement, and kappa value greater than 0.81 indicated excellent agreement. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution MRI in definition of rectal cancer T staging were assessed with pathological result as golden standard.RESULTS:According to pathological result of 49 rectal cancer patients, 3 were pT1, 17 were pT2, 22 were pT3, and 7 were pT4a. In 2 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed focal or diffuse significantly higher signal close to perirectal fat. And in other 47 patients of non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed equal or higher signal compared with pelvic muscle. Interobserver agreement was excellent in diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer with 3.0T high-resolution MRI(Kappa=0.87). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T1 staging was 95.9%(47/49), 1/3 and 100%(46/46) respectively, besides, 1 case was both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. For 2 radiologists, the accuracy of T2 staging was 87.8%(43/49) and 91.8%(45/49) respectively, the sensitivity was both 88.2%(15/17), and the specificity was 87.5%(28/32) and 93.5%(30/32) respectively, besides, 15 cases were both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. The accuracy for T3 staging was 89.8%(44/49) and 93.9%(46/49) respectively, the sensitivity was 86.4%(19/22) and 95.5%(21/22) respectively, and the specificity was both 92.6%(25/27). Radiologist A made correct diagnosis for 19 cases, understaged 2 cases and overstaged 1 case. Radiologist B made correct diagnosis for 21 cases and only overstaged 1 case. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T4a staging was 98.0%(48/49), 7/7 and 97.6%(41/42) respectively, besides, 7 cases were both diagnosed correctly. The overall accuracy of T staging was 85.7%(42/49) and 89.8%(44/49) by two radiologists respectively. The accuracy for differentiating T1/T2 from T3/T4 was 91.8%(45/49) and 95.9%(47/49) by two radiologists respectively. Radiologist A overstaged 2 cases and understaged 2 cases, and radiologist B overstaged 2 cases.CONCLUSION:High-resolution MRI can accurately evaluate preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and help select the high-risk rectal cancer patients with over T3 to receive neoadjuvant treatment.

Application of 3.0T MRI in Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Application of 3.0T magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging in the advanced gastric cancer

[Comparison of Preoperative T Staging by Oral Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and Double Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma].

Comparative study of differential diagnosis value in preoperative T-staging of advanced gastric cancer between 3.0T MRI and 64-slice spiral CT

Application of 3.0T MRI in the preoperative assessment of rectal carcinoma

Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Preoperative Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Using MR 2D Imaging with 3D Reconstruction Techniques

Diagnostic Value of MRI and MSCT in Preoperative TNM Staging of Gastric Cancer

Preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer using 2-D magnetic resonance imaging with 3-D reconstruction techniques.

Value of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

The preoperative values of multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing T staging of gastric carcinoma

A comparison between 3.0 T MRI and histopathology for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

[Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: Comparison Between MR Including Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Contrast Enhanced CT Scan].

Diagnostic Value of 3.0-Tesla High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasion Depth of ;rectal Cancer

APPLICATION OF MRI IN PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING IN RECTAL CANCER

Comparing PET/MRI with PET/CT for Pretreatment Staging of Gastric Cancer

The Evaluation of T-staging of Gastric Carcinomas with Spiral CT and MRI

[Preoperative T Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of the Efficacy of 64-MDCT Versus 3.0T MR Imaging].

Clinical application of MR imaging multiple sequences in preoperative T staging of rectal carcinoma

Evaluation of Multislice Helical CT Scanning in TNM Staging of Gastric Cancer

Preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.