Abstract:Temporal perceptual learning shows specificity to the visual or auditory modality, or asymmetric partial transfer from auditory to visual, but not vice versa. These findings are interpreted as evidence for distributed, rather than central, temporal processing (Ivry & Schlerf, 2008). For visual perceptual learning, location and orientation specificity can be eliminated with double training, indicating that learning specificity may not be used to infer the mechanisms of perceptual learning (e.g., Xiao et al., 2008). Here we investigated whether double training can eliminate the modality specificity in temporal learning. We first replicated asymmetric partial transfer results between auditory and visual learning of a temporal-interval discrimination (TID) task with standard training. The standard interval was marked by a pair of auditory beeps or visual gratings at 100-ms. The subjects practiced either the auditory or the visual TID task for 5 sessions. Visual TID learning had no impact on auditory TID performance (p=0.65), while auditory TID learning improved visual TID performance (p=0.005), although not as much as direction visual TID learning (p=0.028). However, complete learning transfer was evident with double-training. When visual TID learning was paired with an auditory frequency discrimination task at the same 100-ms interval, auditory TID performance was improved similarly to direct auditory training (p=0.051), indicating complete cross-modal learning transfer. Similarly, when auditory TID learning was paired with a visual contrast discrimination task at the same 100-ms interval, visual TID performance was improved equally as direct visual training (p=0.95), again indicating complete cross-modal learning transfer. In both cases we found no significant impact of practicing auditory frequency discrimination or visual contrast discrimination alone on TID performance. Our results suggest mutual and nearly complete learning transfer of TID learning between visual and auditory modalities, which are consistent with a central temporal processing mechanism shared by different modalities. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

The Classical Tdt Perceptual Learning is Mostly Temporal Learning

What is Learned in Perceptual Learning of the Classical Texture Discrimination Task?

Generalization in perceptual learning across stimuli and tasks

A Supramodal and Conceptual Representation of Subsecond Time Revealed with Perceptual Learning of Temporal Interval Discrimination.

Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning

Perceptual learning of basic visual features remains task specific with Training-Plus-Exposure (TPE) training

Perceptual Learning Remains Task Specific with TPE Training

The essential role of stimulus temporal patterning in enabling perceptual learning

Visual Perceptual Learning and Its Specificity and Transfer: A New Perspective

Perceptual Learning Changes the Amplitude Not the Shape of the Temporal Window of Visual Processing.

Perceptual learning evidence for supramodal representation of stimulus orientation at a conceptual level.

Perceptual learning evidence for an interval- and modality-invariant representation of subsecond time

Perceptual Learning Modifies the Functional Specializations of Visual Cortical Areas

Perceptual Learning of Motion Direction Discrimination Transfers to an Opposite Direction with TPE Training.

Mutual Transfer Between Visual and Auditory Temporal Interval Learning Supports a Central Clock in Temporal Processing

The Role of Top-Down Task Context in Learning to Perceive Objects

Perceptual learning: top to bottom

Perceptual learning in contour detection transfer across changes in contour path and orientation

Perceptual learning induces fast processing and efficient representation of face

Perceptual Learning beyond Perception: Mnemonic Representation in Early Visual Cortex and Intraparietal Sulcus

Perceptual Learning of Contrast Discrimination Determined by Stimulus Temporal Pattern but Not Contrast Uncertainty