Abstract:PURPOSE:To investigate the use of stiffness value and stiffness ratio (ratio of lesion to background liver parenchyma values) to discriminate malignant from benign focal liver lesions by using histologic results as the reference standard.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. Three hundred seventy-three patients with focal liver lesions proven at histologic examination underwent measurement of liver stiffness with elastography point quantification. First, stiffness values in two regions of the background liver parenchyma (at 0.5-2 cm and >2 cm from the lesion periphery) near 163 hepatocellular carcinomas were analyzed to determine a reference background liver for calculating the stiffness ratio. Second, the use of the lesion stiffness value and the stiffness ratio for prediction of liver malignancy was investigated in a cohort of patients with 58 benign and 201 malignant lesions. Results were validated in another independent cohort of patients with 25 benign and 89 malignant lesions by using analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.RESULTS:The coefficient of variation for the background liver at 0.5-2 cm from the lesion was higher (196%) than that at greater than 2 cm from the lesion (66%). In the development phase, diagnostic accuracy with use of the stiffness value was significantly higher than that with use of the stiffness ratio for discrimination of malignant from benign lesions (AUC, 0.86 vs 0.66, respectively; P < .001). Diagnostic performance with the stiffness value was lower than that with the stiffness ratio (AUC, 0.53 vs 0.86, respectively; P < .001) for discrimination of cirrhotic nodules from other benign lesions. Diagnostic performance with the stiffness value was significantly lower than that with the stiffness ratio (AUC, 0.58 vs 0.71 respectively; P = .007) for discrimination of metastasis from primary liver cancers. In the validation phase, similar findings were revealed for the discrimination of malignant from benign lesions (AUC, 0.87 vs 0.67; P < .001) and discrimination between metastasis and primary liver cancers (AUC, 0.49 vs 0.73; P < .001).CONCLUSION:Use of stiffness values measured in the liver parenchyma at more than 2 cm from the lesion allowed better diagnostic performance than did values measured in a region closer to the tumor. Stiffness value was more accurate than stiffness ratio for differentiation of malignant from benign focal liver lesions, but the stiffness ratio might be useful for subclassification of benign and malignant lesions. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[Liver Stiffness Measured by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Assessing Hepatic Functional Reserve in Patients with Space-Occupying Lesions in the Liver].

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Space-occupying Liver Lesions: Correlation with Pathology

The clinical value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the assessment of liver functional reserve in patients with hepatic focal lesions

Usefulness of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Application of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for the Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesion Elasticity

Liver and Spleen Stiffness Measurements by Point Shear Wave Elastography Via Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse: Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability and Predictors of Variability in a US Population.

Clinical Value of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions

Use of Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Assessing Liver Functional Reserve: A Clinical Study.

Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography

Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis and Liver Function Reserve Through Non-Invasive Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging

Liver and spleen stiffness measured by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and esophageal varices in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Stiffness Value and Ratio to Discriminate Malignant from Benign Focal Liver Lesions.

Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography imaging

Clinical evaluation of liver stiffness by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patient with ischemic type biliary lesion after orthotopic liver transplantation

Non-invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography.

Longitudinal Monitoring of Liver Stiffness by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Receiving Entecavir.

The Value of Liver Stiffness Measured Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in the Treatment of Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome

Stiffness Value And Serum Biomarkers In Liver Fibrosis Staging: Study In Large Surgical Specimens In Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

Value of acoustic radiation force impulse in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic tumors

Abstract 11981: Prognostic Value of Liver Stiffness Measurement in Patients Undergoing Left-Sided Valvular Surgery

A Noninvasive Indicator for the Diagnosis of Early Hepatitis B Virus-Related Liver Fibrosis.