Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage-experience of a single center
Chuntao WU,Liang LIU,Huaxiang XU,Jin XU,Chen LIU,Jiang LONG,Wenquan WANG,Quanxing NI,Xianjun YU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1007-9424.201704058
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the cause,treatment,and prognosis of the postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH).Method A total of 779 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between January 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled,and the data of them were retrospectively analyzed.Results Sixteen patients (PPH group) suffered from PPH and 763 patients didn't suffered from PPH (non-PPH group) of 779 patients.There was no significant difference in the age,gender,type of disease,operative time,blood loss,and ratio of blood transfusion between the 2 groups (P＞0.05),but the incidences of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying,postoperative drainage time,hospital stay,and mortality were all higher or longer in PPH group compared with non-PPH group (P＜0.001).Of the 16 PPH patients,early haemorrhage occurred in 3 patients (including 2 patients with gastrointestinal haemorrhage and 1 patient with intra-abdominal haemorrhage) and delayed haemorrhage occurred in 13 patients (including 6 patients with gastrointestinal haemorrhage and 7 patients with intra-abdominal haemorrhage).All the 3 patients with early haemorrhage were cured by surgery.Of the 13 patients with delayed haemorrhage,5 patients were cured by radiological intervention,2 patients were cured by endoscopic hemostasis,and 3 patients were cured by conservative treatment,but 3 patients with sentinel bleeding died after interventional embolization+surgery.Conclusions The mortality of PPH is high.Surgery is optimal to early haemorrhage and radiological intervention is optimal to delayed haemorrhage,including embolization or covered stent implantation.The sentinel bleeding should be given great attention.