Abstract:Crop yield can be affected by crop water use and vice versa, so when trying to simulate one or the other, it can be important that both are simulated well. In a prior inter-comparison among maize growth models, evapotranspiration (ET) predictions varied widely, but no observations of actual ET were available for comparison. Therefore, this follow-up study was initiated under the umbrella of AgMIP (Agricultural Model Inter-Comparison and Improvement Project). Observations of daily ET using the eddy covariance technique from an 8-year-long (2006-2013) experiment conducted at Ames, IA were used as the standard for comparison among models. Simulation results from 29 models are reported herein. In the first "blind" phase for which only weather, soils, phenology, and management information were provided to the modelers, estimates of seasonal ET varied from about 200 to about 700 mm. Subsequent three phases provided (1) leaf area indices for all years, (2) all daily ET and agronomic data for a typical year (2011), and (3) all data for all years, thus allowing the modelers to progressively calibrate their models as more information was provided, but the range among ET estimates still varied by a factor of two or more. Much of the variability among the models was due to differing estimates of potential evapotranspiration, which suggests an avenue for substantial model improvement. Nevertheless, the ensemble median values were generally close to the observations, and the medians were best (had the lowest mean squared deviations from observations, MSD) for several ET categories for inter-comparison, but not all. Further, the medians were best when considering both ET and agronomic parameters together. The best six models with the lowest MSDs were identified for several ET and agronomic categories, and they proved to vary widely in complexity in spite of having similar prediction accuracies. At the same time, other models with apparently similar approaches were not as accurate. The models that are widely used tended to perform better, leading us speculate that a larger number of users testing these models over a wider range of conditions likely has led to improvement. User experience and skill at calibration and dealing with missing input data likely were also a factor in determining the accuracy of model predictions. In several cases different versions of a model within the same family of models were run, and these within-family inter-comparisons identified particular approaches that were better while other factors were held constant. Thus, improvement is needed in many of the models with regard to their ability to simulate ET over a wide range of conditions, and several aspects for progress have been identified, especially in their simulation of potential ET.

Quantifying the Combined Effects of Climatic, Crop and Soil Factors on Surface Resistance in a Maize Field

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

A Revised Surface Resistance Parameterisation for Estimating Latent Heat Flux from Remotely Sensed Data.

Simulation of Maize Evapotranspiration: an Inter-Comparison among 29 Maize Models

Simulation of Evapotranspiration and Yield of Maize: an Inter-comparison among 41 Maize Models

Prediction of Evapotranspiration and Yields of Maize: An Inter comparison among 29 Maize Models

Mapping Maize Evapotranspiration with Two-Source Land Surface Energy Balance Approaches and Multiscale Remote Sensing Imagery Pixel Sizes: Accuracy Determination toward a Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture

Estimating evapotranspiration and yield of wheat and maize croplands through a remote sensing-based model

Prediction of Evapotranspiration and Yields of Maize: An Inter comparison among 31 Maize Models

Uncertainties Caused by Resistances in Evapotranspiration Estimation Using High-Density Eddy Covariance Measurements

A Model for Estimating Transpiration from Remotely Sensed Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Integrating Temperature Gradient-Based 3T and Resistance-Based Models for Simulating Evapotranspiration and Its Components

Uncertainty caused by resistances in evapotranspiration

Estimating and partitioning evapotranspiration in a film mulched cropland with shallow groundwater by the improved dual source model

Corn, soybeans and winter wheat water requirements over the contiguous United States between 2013 and 2021: The application of the SEBALIGEE v2 global model

Simulations of the Soil Evaporation and Crop Transpiration Beneath a Maize Crop Canopy in a Humid Area

Improving the evapotranspiration estimation by considering the effect of flux footprint climatology

Precision Estimation of Crop Coefficient for Maize Cultivation Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery to Enhance Evapotranspiration Assessment in Agriculture

Evaluating Soil Resistance Formulations in Thermal‐Based Two‐Source Energy Balance (TSEB) Model: Implications for Heterogeneous Semiarid and Arid Regions

The dependence of evaporative efficiency of vegetated surfaces on ground cover mass fractions in vegetated soils in mesic ecosystems

Experimental, Verification of A Mechanistic Model to Partition Evapotranspiration into Soil Water and Plant Evaporation