Abstract:The prediction of mass transfer rate is one of the key elements for estimation of the flow accelerated corrosion (FAC) rate. Three low Reynolds number (LRN) k–ɛ models (Lam–Bremhorst (LB), Abe–Kondoh–Nagano (AKN) and Hwang–Lin (HL)), one LRN k–ω (Wilcox, WX) model and the k–ω SST model are tested for the computation of the high Schmidt number mass transfer, especially in the flow through an orifice. The models are tested in the computation of three types of flow: (1) the fully developed pipe flow, (2) the flow over a backward facing step, (3) the flow through an orifice. The HL model shows a good performance in predicting mass transfer in the fully developed pipe flow but fails to give reliable prediction in the flow through an orifice. The WX model and the k–ω SST model underpredict the mass transfer rate in the flow types 1 and 3. The LB model underestimates the mass transfer in the flow type 1, but shows abnormal behavior at the reattaching point in type 3. Synthetically evaluating all the models in all the computed case, the AKN model is the best one; however, the prediction is still not satisfactory. In the evaluation in the flow over a backward facing step shows k–ω SST model shows superior performance. This is interpreted as an implication that the combination of the k–ɛ model and the stress limiter can improve the model behavior in the recirculation bubble. Both the stress limiter similar to that utilized in WX and SST model and Kato–Launder modification are implemented in the AKN model and help to lower the peak of mass transfer coefficient, while raising the values in the downstream. The value of turbulent Schmidt number is also investigated in this paper. If a uniform value is used, Sct≈1.0 can be reasonable in the case of high Schmidt mass transfer. Sct=1.71(y+)−0.38 can be used to predict the high Schmidt mass transfer in the simple flows.

A Mixed-Time-scale Low-Reynolds-number One-Equation Turbulence Model

A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Recirculating Flows

Development of K-R Turbulence Model for Wall -Bounded Flows

A Scale-Adaptive Turbulence Model Based on the k-Equation and Recalibrated Reynolds Stress Constitutive Relation

An Improved Low-Reynolds-Number K – Ε Model for Aerodynamic Flows

One-Equation Turbulence Model Based on Extended Bradshaw Assumption

A new turbulence model based on scale decomposition

A New Subgrid Eddy-Viscosity Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of Anisotropic Turbulence

Large eddy simulation of scalar turbulence using a new subgrid eddy diffusivity model

STUDY OF WALL-PARAMETER FREE LOW-REYNOLDS NUMBER NONLINEAR EDDY- VISCOSITY MODEL

Turbulence Modeling for Mass Transfer Enhancement by Separation and Reattachment with Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Models

Coupling of Eddy-Viscosity-Scale Reynolds-Stress Model with an Algebraic Transition Model

Quasi-dynamic subgrid-scale kinetic energy equation model for large-eddy simulation of compressible flows

A New Hybrid Turbulence Model Applied to Highly Turbulent Taylor-Couette Flow

Mixed analytical/numerical method for low-Reynolds-number k-ε turbulence models

An application of the shear stress transport lowGReynoldsGnumber k Gε turbulence model on turbulent flows

A Nonlineark-εTurbulence Model Applicable to High Pressure Gradient and Large Curvature Flow

Modelling high-Reynolds-number effects in fully developed channel flows using a two-scale Reynolds stress model

Mixed Analytical/numerical Method Applied to the High Reynolds Number K–ε Turbulence Model

Mixed Analytical/Numerical Method for Low-Reynolds-Number K-Epsilon Turbulence Models

On a 1/2-equation model of turbulence