Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

The Supply and Demand Factor in the Bond Market: Implications for Bond Risk and Return

Preferred-Habitat and Demand Factors in the Term Structure: Evidence from the Chinese Bond Market

Supply and Demand and the Term Structure of Interest Rates

The Demand Effect of Yield-Chasing Retail Investors: Evidence from the Chinese Enterprise Bond Market

How do Retail Investors Affect Credit Bond Pricing:Analysis on the Two Prices of the Same Bond

A consumption-based term structure model of bonds and equity

Firms' Bond Market Access and Impact on Bank Borrowing Costs

The Implied Views of Bond Traders on the Spot Equity Market

Pricing fixed income derivatives under a three-factor CIR model with unspanned stochastic volatility

Augmented Factor Models with Applications to Validating Market Risk Factors and Forecasting Bond Risk Premia

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

The Factors That Affect Market Interest Rates in Chinese Bond Market

The Chinese Bond Market: Risk, Return, and Opportunities

Pricing Corporate Bonds with the Short-Selling Constraint

Why Are Excess Returns on China’s Treasury Bonds So Predictable? the Role of the Monetary System

China'S Official Rates and Bond Yields

Can Structural Models Price Default Risk? New Evidence from Bond and Credit Derivative Markets

A Study on the Criteria for Investment in the Bond Market

Risks and Risk Premia in the US Treasury Market

Risk and Return Trade-Off in the U.S. Treasury Market

Security Lending and Corporate Financing: The Case of the Debt Market