Zircon U–Pb Dating, Trace Element and Sr–Nd–Hf Isotope Geochemistry of Paleozoic Granites in the Miao’ershan–Yuechengling Batholith, South China: Implication for Petrogenesis and Tectonic–magmatic Evolution

Kui-Dong Zhao,Shao-Yong Jiang,Tao Sun,Wei-Feng Chen,Hong-Fei Ling,Pei-Rong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.026
IF: 3
2013-01-01
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
Abstract:The Miao’ershan–Yuechengling batholith (MYB) is one of the largest granitic batholiths in South China. At least five individual phases have been identified for the Paleozoic granites in the MYB. SHRIMP and LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb dating results imply that these granites were emplaced at 435±4Ma, 427±3Ma, 417±6Ma, 404±6Ma and 382±2Ma, respectively. The ages gradually decreased from the southeast to the northwest, implying that the MYB was incrementally emplaced from the southeast to the northwest lasting from early Silurian to late Devonian. Most granites are metaluminous to weakly peraluminous, and contain low P2O5 contents (<0.15%). These granites show enrichment of Rb, Th, U and depletion of Ba, Sr, Eu, Ti. They show relatively high (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (>0.715), low εNd(t) values (−8.9 to −6.7), and low zircon εHf(t) values (−9.5 to −4.0). These geochemical and isotopic characteristics indicate that these granites may have formed from partial melting of Paleoproterozoic basement rocks. Slight geochemical differences between different phases can be interpreted as resulting from partial melting of heterogeneous sources or different proportion mixing of meta-igneous and meta-sedimentary rocks. Zircon Hf isotope model ages vary from 1.77 to 1.93Ga, with an average value of 1.84±0.07Ga. These data indicate that crust growth in this region took place mainly during the Paleoproterozoic (ca. 1.84Ga), and the basement in the MYB should belong to the Cathaysia Block. The formation of the Paleozoic granites in the MYB was suggested to be related to the late orogenic magmatism of the Wuyi–Yunkai orogeny. Thus, the late orogenic magmatism in the northwestern part of the Wuyi–Yunkai orogeny must have lasted until ca. 381Ma and took place also to the east of the Anhua–Luocheng Fault.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?