Abstract:Observational and numerical studies have shown that the kinematic characteristics of two or more coronal mass ejections (CMEs) may change significantly after a CME collision. The collision of CMEs can have a different nature, i.e. inelastic, elastic, and superelastic processes, depending on their initial kinematic characteristics. In this article, we first review the existing definitions of collision types including Newton’s classical definition, the energy definition, Poisson’s definition, and Stronge’s definition, of which the first two were used in the studies of CME–CME collisions. Then, we review the recent research progresses on the nature of CME–CME collisions with the focus on which CME kinematic properties affect the collision nature. It is shown that observational analysis and numerical simulations can both yield an inelastic, perfectly inelastic, merging-like collision, or a high possibility of a superelastic collision. Meanwhile, previous studies based on a 3D collision picture suggested that a low approaching speed of two CMEs is favorable for a superelastic nature. Since CMEs are an expanding magnetized plasma structure, the CME collision process is quite complex, and we discuss this complexity. Moreover, the models used in both observational and numerical studies contain many limitations. All of the previous studies on collisions have not shown the separation of two colliding CMEs after a collision. Therefore the collision between CMEs cannot be considered as an ideal process in the context of a classical Newtonian definition. In addition, many factors are not considered in either observational analysis or numerical studies, e.g. CME-driven shocks and magnetic reconnections. Owing to the complexity of the CME collision process, a more detailed and in-depth observational analysis and simulation work are needed to fully understand the CME collision process.

Could the Collision of CMEs in the Heliosphere Be Super‒elastic? Validation Through Three‒dimensional Simulations

Turn on the Super-Elastic Collision Nature of Coronal Mass Ejections Through Low Approaching Speed

Assessing the Nature of Collisions of Coronal Mass Ejections in the Inner Heliosphere

Energy Analysis During the Collision of Two Successive Cmes

On the Collision Nature of Two Coronal Mass Ejections: A Review

Super-elastic Collision of Large-Scale Magnetized Plasmoids in the Heliosphere

On Understanding the Nature of Collisions of Coronal Mass Ejections Observed by Stereo

Three-Dimensional Mhd Simulation of Two Coronal Mass Ejections' Propagation and Interaction Using A Successive Magnetized Plasma Blobs Model

Numerical Simulations on the Deflection of Coronal Mass Ejections in the Interplanetary Space

Evolution of the 12 July 2012 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data‐constrained Three‐dimensional MHD Simulations

A Numerical Simulation on the Solar-Terrestrial Transit Time of Successive CMEs During November 4-5, 1998

Simulated Coronal Mass Ejections on a young Solar-Type Star and the Associated Instantaneous Angular Momentum Loss

Numerical Research on the Effect of the Initial Parameters of a CME Flux-rope Model on Simulation Results. II. Different Locations of Observers

Successive interacting coronal mass ejections: How to create a perfect storm?

Numerical Simulation of the May 12, 1997 CME Event - the Role of Magnetic Reconnection

Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 2012-July-12 CME Event With the Fluxrope-G3DMHD Model

Full-Halo Coronal Mass Ejections: Arrival at the Earth

A Data‐constrained Three‐dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation Model for a Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation

Three-Dimensional Parameters of the Earth-Impacting CMEs Based on the GCS Model

Multi-point Shock and Flux Rope Analysis of Multiple Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Around 2010 August 1 in the Inner Heliosphere

Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the Interaction Between Two Interplanetary Magnetic Clouds and Its Consequent Geoeffectiveness: 2. Oblique Collision