Abstract:Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial. Materials and methods: Thirty-six consecutive patients (59.2 ± 10.7 years, range 38-76 years) needing bilateral sinus floor elevation surgery agreed to participate in this study. In a parallel split mouth design randomized clinical trial, in which the allocation of the surgical technique to be used on the determined sites was randomly assigned, one site was always treated with conventional rotative instruments (control group) and the other site with piezosurgery (test group). In addition, in a random order, the grafted sites were covered with a collagen membrane or no membrane. After a healing period of 3-4 months implants were placed. Results: Comparison of clinical features of the test and control sites revealed no differences with regard to wound healing and complications (perforations of the sinus membrane) during or postsurgery (p = .458, p = 1.0, respectively). A clinically insignificant, but statistically shorter operation time was observed when using conventional rotative instruments (11.1 ± 2.4 minutes) than using piezosurgery (15.1 ± 2.9 minutes; p < .001). In both groups, application of a resorbable membrane did not result in less horizontal bone resorption (membrane: 1.43 mm, no membrane: 1.06 mm; p = .062); All 193 implants could be placed with primary stability. One year after functional loading, survival rate was 100%. Conclusion: It can be concluded that, for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, a piezoelectric device shows no advantages over rotative instruments as well as that placement of a barrier membrane did not reduce resorption of the augmented site.

Piezoelectric Surgery in Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Hydraulic Pressure for Xenograft and Simultaneous Implant Placement.

Piezoelectric Ostectomy for the Surgical Approach of the Maxillary Sinus Elevation with Dental Implantation

[Research Progress in Maxillary Sinus Mucosal Disease Associated with Maxillary Sinus Floor Lifting].

The Use of A Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Osteotome for Internal Sinus Elevation: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Results

A clinical study of piezosurgery osteotomy in lateral sinus floor augmentation

Augmentation of Atrophic Posterior Maxilla by Sinus Floor Elevation

Maxillary sinus floor elevation: an overview

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Maxillary Sinus Lifting and Immediate Implant Placement: A Case Report

Clinical application and usefullness of piezosurgery in oral implant surgery

Minimally invasive maxillary sinus lift techniques via crestal approach with dental implants placement simultaneously

Comparison between conventional and piezoelectric surgical tools for maxillary sinus floor elevation. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Perforated schneiderian membrane repair during sinus augmentation in conjunction with immediate implant placement

Simultaneous sinus elevation and immediate implant placement without biomaterial: A technical note

Piezosurgery in implant dentistry

A Review of Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques: Lateral Window, Transcrestal, Graft Materials, and Biologics

A New Technique for Minimally Invasive Maxillary Lateral Sinus Augmentation: a Case Report.

Transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogeneic bone substitute in gel form: A clinical, radiological and histological analysis

Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Maxillary Sinus Lifting and Grafting

Osteogenetic mechanism and clinical surgical selection of maxillary sinus floor elevation

The endoscopically assisted transcrestal sinus floor elevation with platelet-rich fibrin at an immediate implantation of periapical lesion site: A case report.

A combined lateral-crestal approach of sinus floor elevation: A report on three cases.