Abstract:In the military field, in view of the poor adaptability of the traditional command and control system, complex network theory is used to describe the hierarchical structure and correlation between the elements of the charge network, and the edge weighting method of the charge network based on the attributes of the node itself and the attributes of the network is proposed. This method can handle the cooperative relationship between the nodes well and is more realistic. It has the characteristics of small world and no scale, which enhances the command coordination ability and effectively improves the command efficiency of the network. The command and control (C2) network is a complete organizational system that connects operational units at all levels based on command relationships. Its purpose is to ensure that the C2 system can fully perform its command functions, achieving high precision and efficiency in decision‐making. As warfare models evolve rapidly from network‐centric warfare to multi‐domain operations, traditional C2 networks, which utilize a tree structure for connectivity, exhibit only a single hierarchical relationship, making it challenging for different operational units at the same level to interconnect. Furthermore, with the diversification of warfare, the three types of nodes in traditional C2 network models are insufficient to encompass all operational units. In response, this paper proposes a method for edge weighting in C2 networks based on a combination of node attributes and network attributes described by complex network theory. The node attributes mainly include node information transmission capacity, task coordination ability between nodes, node distance, and response time. The network attributes are primarily represented by hierarchy and betweenness centrality. Additionally, the traditional C2 network model's three types of nodes are expanded to five types of nodes. Based on the edge weighting method, internal command edges, inter‐network collaborative edges, and cross‐level command edges are generated within the C2 network. Simulation results demonstrate that the constructed C2 network model's characteristic parameters are superior to those of traditional C2 networks and collaborative C2 networks. This improvement enhances command and coordination abilities, aligns more closely with real‐world scenarios, and effectively improves network command and control efficiency.

Combat Model Based on Complex Network

Reliability Analysis of Combat Architecture Model Based on Complex Network

Modeling of the Mimic Defense Based on Heterogeneous Redundancy

Empirical Research on Complex Networks Modeling of Combat SoS Based on Data from Real War-Game, Part I: Statistical Characteristics

Research on construction method of command and control network model based on complex network theory

Robustness of double-layer group-dependent combat network with cascading failure

Damage Maximization for Combat Network with Limited Costs

Simulation Model of Network Instruction and Defense Using Multi-Agent

A Method to Validate Operational Capability Index Model of Heterogeneous Combat Networks Based on Characteristic Topology Analysis

Research on the Combat SoS Complex Network

A Two-Dimension Security Assessing Model for CMDs Combined with Generalized Stochastic Petri Net

Dynamic hypernetwork-based evolutionary model of command-and-control network

Evaluation and Optimization of a Command and Control System Based on Complex Networks Theory

Modeling and Control Architecture for the Competitive Networked Robot System Based on POMDP

Research on Warship Fleet NCW Model Base on Complex Networks

Analysis of OODA Loop based on Adversarial for Complex Game Environments

Warfare CAWSOM Model

A New Approach for Target Capability Assessment and Selection in Complex Situations

Simulation research on a new model of network defense situation

A method of network attack-defense game and collaborative defense decision-making based on hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning

CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF ATTACK STRATEGIESAND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS ON THREE NETWORK MODELS