Self‐assembly of supramolecular double helix from a tetrapeptide and direct visualization by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
Marzio Rancan,Annalisa Bisello,Silvia Carlotto,Andrea Basagni,Renato Schiesari,Pradip Kumar Mondal,Fernando Formaggio,Saverio Santi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202404080
2024-12-12
Chemistry - A European Journal
Abstract:This work reports single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM), and quantum mechanics calculations of the 310‐helical peptide Z‐(Aib)2‐L‐Dap(Boc)‐Aib‐NHiPr (Aib, α‐aminoisobutyric acid; Dap, 2,3‐diaminopropionic acid; Z, benzyloxycarbonyl; Boc, t‐butoxycarbonyl). The peptide forms a double‐helical superstructure, studied by XRD and STM. Such architecture is rare in short peptides. Here, we show, by combining XRD, STM that this intriguing conformational feature is not driven by crystal packing; rather, it is an intrinsic property of this peptide. Indeed, the double helix is clearly detected also by STM, where crystal packing cannot be invoked. XRD reveals that intermolecular H‐bonds stabilize two left‐handed supra‐helices (tertiary structure) that develop around a 6‐fold screw axis. Then, two supra‐helices are intertwined in a quaternary structure as a left‐handed, double supra‐helix, where C–H⋯π interactions play a crucial role. STM images show the formation of long, isolated "necklaces" (> 110 nm). They are of left and right helical handedness. Their size agrees with the XRD finding. DFT calculations allowed us to weigh the contribution of the different intermolecular interactions in the two single supra‐helices and the supramolecular double‐helix. Interestingly, we were able to conclude that the contribution of the C‐H⋯π interactions to the binding energies is close to 50%.
chemistry, multidisciplinary