A Ruthenium(ii) Arene Complex Showing Emission Enhancement and Photocleavage Activity Towards DNA from Singlet and Triplet Excited States Respectively.

Yongjie Chen,Wanhua Lei,Guoyu Jiang,Qianxiong Zhou,Yuanjun Hou,Chao Li,Baowen Zhang,Xuesong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt33090g
IF: 4
2013-01-01
Dalton Transactions
Abstract:The emission enhancement behavior and photocleavage activity of a ruthenium(II) arene complex, [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(dppn)(py)](2+) (1) (dppn = 4,5,9,16-tetraaza-dibenzo[a,c]naphthacene, py = pyridine), towards DNA were compared with [(eta(6)-p-cymene) Ru(bpy)(py)](2+) (2), [Ru(bpy)(2)(dppz)](2+) (3) and [Ru(bpy)(2)(dppn)](2+) (4) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dppz = dipyrido-[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine). It was found that 1 emits fluorescence from the dppn-based ligand-centered (LC) singlet excited state and generates singlet oxygen (O-1(2)) from the dppn-based LC triplet excited state. As a result, 1 displays emission enhancement behavior and photocleavage activity towards DNA simultaneously. In contrast, 3 is the most classical DNA light switch but shows poor DNA photocleavage activity, while 4 is an efficient DNA photocleaver but cannot report DNA binding by luminescence enhancement. An increased cytotoxicity against human lung carcinoma cells A549 by about 10-fold was also observed for 1 upon visible light activation. These intriguing properties result from the unique combination of the Ru(II) arene and dppn subunits.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?