Concentration and Pollution Assessment of Hazardous Metal Elements in Sediments of the Xiangjiang River, China

Longjiang Mao,Duowen Mo,Jinghong Yang,Yaofeng Jia,Yuanyuan Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1800-4
2012-01-01
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Abstract:The concentrations of 21 metals in surface sediments collected from 16 stations in lower reach of Xiangjiang River (Zhuzhou–Xiangtan–Changsha section) were determined by using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy and their pollution levels were assessed by applying enrichment factor (EF), the geo-accumulation index (I geo) and pollution index (PI). The results show the total concentrations in μg g−1 are as follows: 1.80–14.88 for Sc, 16.66–144.29 for V, 13.27–87.99 for Cr, 159.50–2413.74 for Mn, 2.21–23.14 for Co, 4.71–42.45 for Ni, 5.31–188.89 for Cu, 38.41–1250.47 for Zn; 5.1–22.15 for Ga, 91.8–161.57 for Rb, 20.4–62.51 for Sr, 0.2–2.45 for Mo, 0.9–81.79 for Cd, 3.8–30.3 for Sn, 5.9–18.33 for Cs, 208.10–464.74 for Ba, 1.6–22.05 for W, 18.90–198.01 for Pb, 0.3–8.54 for Bi, 2.6–18.27 for Th, 0.6–13.62 for U. The mean concentrations in sediments divided by the UCC value decrease in the order of Cd > Bi > W > Zn > Pb > Cs > Sn > Mn > Cu > 1.5 times > Cr > U = Ni > V > Co > Rb > 1.0 time > Th > Ga > Sc > Mo > Ba > Sr. The calculated EF and I geo of metals implied the lower reach of Xiangjiang River had widespread been polluted by Cd, Bi, W, Cs, Pb, Zn, Sn, and locally been polluted by Cu and Mn, and not been polluted by other 12 metals. The PI values indicated almost all stations had been polluted by metals in this river.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?