Comparative Study of the Contents of Analogues of Aristolochic Acid in Two Kinds of Aristolochiae Fructus by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Yu-Qiong Xu,Xiao-Wei Li,Guang-Xue Liu,Xuan Wang,Ming-Ying Shang,Xiao-Mei Li,Shao-Qing Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-012-0664-9
2012-01-01
Abstract:Aristolochiae Fructus ("Madouling") is derived from the fruits of Aristolochia contorta and A. debilis (Aristolochiaceae). These two species contain potentially nephrotoxic constituents, but are officially used in China. Distinction of constituents and toxicity between these two species remains unclear. A high-performance liquid chromatography method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of seven analogues of aristolochic acid (aristolochic acids I, II, IIIa, IVa and VIIa), as well as aristololactams I and II in Aristolochiae Fructus. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Zorbax SB-C(18) column with a gradient mobile phase comprising acetonitrile and 1 % acetic acid-30 mM triethylamine (20:1, v/v) buffer. Analytes were detected with a diode array detector at 250 and 260 nm. The contents of seven constituents in samples (11 batches of A. contorta fruits, 15 batches of A. debilis fruits and 33 commercial samples of Madouling) were determined. The content of aristolochic acid IVa was higher than that of aristolochic acid VIIa in A. contorta fruits, whereas the opposite was true in A. debilis fruits. This feature can be used to distinguish the two species from each other and identify the resource plant of Madouling. Through a morphological method and a newly found principle based on the ratio AA-IVa/AA-VIIa, we found that the 33 commercial samples collected from 12 provinces in China were all derived from the fruits of A. contorta.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?