Gastric Remnant Cancer Patients Had a Better Prognosis Than Upper-Third Gastric Cancer Patients in a Case-Control Study after Surgical Treatment

Fangxuan Li,Rupeng Zhang,Han Liang,Jichuan Quan,Hui Liu,Hui Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030089161309900412

2013-01-01

Tumori

Abstract:Background The aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes of gastric remnant carcinoma patients with those of patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data extracted from 112 gastric remnant carcinomas and 367 upper-third gastric cancer patients were analyzed to explore the clinicopathologic differences between two groups. After radical resection, prognostic difference between them was evaluated through a 1:2 matched case-control study. Results The pattern of gastric remnant carcinomas showed a male predominance. Undifferentiated type histology, depth at T4 stage and distant metastases were more frequent in gastric remnant carcinomas than in upper-third gastric cancers (P <0.05). The radical resectability of gastric remnant carcinomas was lower and the multi-visceral resectabilitiy was relatively higher than the other group (P = 0.00). Gastric remnant carcinomas trended to have a higher incidence of metastases to either mesojejunum or lower mediastinal lymph nodes than upper-third gastric cancers, but patient survival was not significantly different. In the case-control study, gastric remnant carcinomas had a better prognosis than upper-third gastric cancers after radical resection when the clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment were matched. Conclusions Although there was no significant prognostic distinction between gastric remnant carcinomas and upper-third gastric cancer, after radical surgical treatment, patients with the former had an even better prognosis.