Abstract:Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation is an epigenetic alteration crucial for regulating stress responses. Identifying large-scale DNA methylation at single nucleotide resolution is made possible by whole genome bisulfite sequencing. An essential task following the generation of bisulfite sequencing data is to detect differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) among treatments. Most statistical methods for DMC detection do not consider the dependency of methylation patterns across the genome, thus possibly inflating type I error. Furthermore, small sample sizes and weak methylation effects among different phenotype categories make it difficult for these statistical methods to accurately detect DMCs. To address these issues, the wavelet-based functional mixed model (WFMM) was introduced to detect DMCs. To further examine the performance of WFMM in detecting weak differential methylation events, we used both simulated and empirical data and compare WFMM performance to a popular DMC detection tool methylKit. Analyses of simulated data that replicated the effects of the herbicide glyphosate on DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana show that WFMM results in higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting DMCs compared to methylKit, especially when the methylation differences among phenotype groups are small. Moreover, the performance of WFMM is robust with respect to small sample sizes, making it particularly attractive considering the current high costs of bisulfite sequencing. Analysis of empirical Arabidopsis thaliana data under varying glyphosate dosages, and the analysis of monozygotic (MZ) twins who have different pain sensitivities-both datasets have weak methylation effects of <1%-show that WFMM can identify more relevant DMCs related to the phenotype of interest than methylKit. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) are genomic regions with different DNA methylation status across biological samples. DMRs and DMCs are essentially the same concepts, with the only difference being how methylation information across the genome is summarized. If methylation levels are determined by grouping neighboring cytosine sites, then they are DMRs; if methylation levels are calculated based on single cytosines, they are DMCs.

Quantitative Identification of Differentially Methylated Loci Based on Relative Entropy for Matched Case-Control Data.

Qdmr: A Quantitative Method For Identification Of Differentially Methylated Regions By Entropy

Identification of Functionally Methylated Regions Based on Discriminant Analysis Through Integrating Methylation and Gene Expression Data

Data-Driven-Based Approach to Identifying Differentially Methylated Regions Using Modified 1D Ising Model.

Age-Adjusted Nonparametric Detection of Differential Dna Methylation with Case-Control Designs

A Statistical Method for Detecting Differentially Methylated Gene Functional Regions Based on Case-Control Studies

Detecting Differentially Methylated Loci for Illumina Array Methylation Data Based on Human Ovarian Cancer Data.

RankDMG: a differentially methylated gene analysis method for three special scenarios

A Hybrid Ensemble Approach for Identifying Robust Differentially Methylated Loci in Pan-Cancers

Wemics: A Single‐Base Resolution Methylation Quantification Method for Enhanced Prediction of Epigenetic Regulation

Identifying Differential Methylation in Cancer Epigenetics via a Bayesian Functional Regression Model

Detecting differentially methylated regions in bisulfite sequencing data using quasi-binomial mixed models with smooth covariate effect estimates

HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model

Identification of Differentially Methylated Sites with Weak Methylation Effects.

The Identification of Specific Methylation Patterns across Different Cancers

Discriminating Origin Tissues of Tumor Cell Lines by Methylation Signatures and Dys-Methylated Rules

Detection of differentially methylated CpG sites between tumor samples with uneven tumor purities.

Comparison of Different Normalization Assumptions for Analyses of Dna Methylation Data from the Cancer Genome

Identification of the Differential DNA Methylation Markers among Cancers

A Classification Approach for DNA Methylation Profiling with Bisulfite Next-Generation Sequencing Data

A novel method for detecting association between DNA methylation and diseases using spatial information