C-terminal in Sp1-like Artificial Zinc-Finger Proteins Plays Crucial Roles in Determining Their DNA Binding Affinity

Baozhen Zhang,Shengyan Xiang,Yanru Yin,Liankun Gu,Dajun Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-106
2013-01-01
BMC Biotechnology
Abstract:Background It is well known that the C- terminal zinc-finger-3 in transcription factor Sp1 contributes more than the N- terminal zinc-finger-1 in determining Sp1’s DNA binding capacity. Sp1-like artificial poly-zinc-finger proteins (ZFPs) are powerful biotechnological tools for gene-specific recognization and manipulation. It is important to understand whether the C- terminal fingers in the Sp1-like artificial ZFPs remain crucial for their DNA binding ability. Recently, a set of p16 promoter-specific seven-ZFPs (7ZFPs) has been constructed to reactivate the expression of methylation-silenced p16 . These 7ZFPs contain one N- terminal three-zinc-finger domain of Sp1 (3ZF), two Sp1-like two-zinc-finger domains derived from the Sp1 finger-2 and finger-3 (2ZF) in the middle and C- terminal regions. Results In the present study, sets of variants for several representative 7ZFPs with the p16- binding affinity were further constructed. This was accomplished through finger replacements and key amino acid mutations in the N -terminal fingers, C -terminal fingers, and linker peptide, respectively. Their p16- binding activity was analysed using gel mobility shift assays. Results showed that the motif replacement or a key amino acid mutation (S > R) at position +2 of the α-helix in the C- terminal 2ZF domain completely abolished their p16- binding affinity. Deletion of three amino acids in a consensus linker (TGEKP > TG) between finger-7 and the 6 × Histidine-tag in the C- terminal also dramatically abolished their binding affinity. In contrast, the replacement of the finger-3 in the N -terminal 3ZF domain did not affect their binding affinity, but decreased their binding stability. Conclusions Altogether, the present study show that the C- terminal region may play crucial roles in determining the DNA binding affinity of Sp1-like artificial ZFPs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?