Quantification Of Visceral Adipose Tissue Using Lunar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry In Asian Chinese

Huandong Lin,Hongmei Yan,Shengxiang Rao,Mingfeng Xia,Qi Zhou,Hao Xu,Megan P Rothney,Yi Xia,Wynn K Wacker,David L Ergun,Mengsu Zeng,Xin Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20325
IF: 9.298
2013-01-01
Obesity
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the new DXA VAT method on an Asian Chinese population by comparing to a reference method, computed tomography (CT).Design and Methods: In total, 145 adult men and women volunteers, representing a wide range of ages (19-83 years) and BMI values (18.5-39.3 kg/m(2)) were studied with both DXA and CT.Results: The coefficient of determination (r(2)) for regression of CT on DXA values was 0.947 for females, 0.891 for males and 0.915 combined. The 95% confidence interval for r was 0.940-0.969 for the combined data. The Bland- Altman test showed a VAT bias (CT as standard method) of 143 cm(3) for females and 379 cm(3) for males. Combined, the bias was 262 cm(3) with 95% limits of agreement of -232 to 755 cm(3). While the current DXA method moderately overestimates the VAT volume for the study subjects, a further analysis suggested that the overestimation could be largely contributed to VAT movement due to breath-holding status.Conclusions: For Asian Chinese, VAT measured with DXA is highly correlated to VAT measured with CT. Validation of the DXA VAT tool using a reference method (e.g., CT) needs to carefully control the breath-holding protocol.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?