Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of toal astragalosides after intravenous infusion of astragalosides injection in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Meijuan Xu,Jungang Yin,Liyan Xie,Jun Zhang,Chong Zou,Jiandong Zou,Fang Liu,Wenzheng Ju,Ping Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2013.05.004
IF: 6.656
2013-01-01
Phytomedicine
Abstract:Total astragalosides (TA) are the principal active constituents isolated from Radix Astragali, which has been extensively used in the traditional Chinese medicine for hundreds of years. However, few detailed pharmacokinetic studies about TA or its main component in human have been done to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of astragaloside IV (AGS-IV), the primary ingredient of TA, and tolerance of TA after single- and multi-intravenous infusion of astragalosides injection (AI) in healthy Chinese volunteers. A LC–MS/MS assay was developed for AGS-IV determination in human plasma and urine, and the PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values of AGS-IV were 2.12, 3.59, 3.71 and 5.17μgml−1 after single doses of 200, 300, 400 and 500ml of AI, respectively. The corresponding mean values of area under the plasma concentration (AUC0−∞) were 4.38, 9.75, 13.59 and 18.22μghml−1, respectively, and the mean values of elimination half-life (t1/2) were 2.14, 2.59, 2.62 and 2.69h, respectively. In the repeated dose study, no significant difference was observed between the PK parameters, peak time (Tmax), t1/2 and AUC, of day 1 and day 7. Cumulative urinary excretion of AGS-IV was 3.91% within 24h after administration of 500ml AI. AI was safe and well tolerated, and the adverse events, such as raised total bilirubin and rash, were mild and resolved spontaneously. In summary, the pharmacokinetic properties of AGS-IV are based on linear pharmacokinetics over the doses ranging from 200 to 500ml of AI. No accumulation of AGS-IV was observed after repeated administration of AI once daily. AI was safe and well tolerated in this study, although cases of transient adverse events were observed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?