Comparison of Different Orthosis for Improving Gait in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

吴强,马宗浩,何成奇

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.22.023

2013-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Drop ring lock knee-ankle-foot orthosis has been widely used in patients with higher level spinal cord injury, with one primary limitation in ambulation being attributable to the absence of knee flexion in swing phase. As a result, an individual is forced to use compensatory upper body motions to advance the legs. At present, the research on the comparison between different knee-ankle-foot orthoses is rare. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the clinical effect of E-MAG and drop ring lock knee-ankle-foot orthosis in the treatment of the patients with spinal cord injury. METHODS: With the approach of case crossover study, the application effect of drop ring lock knee-ankle-foot orthosis in combination with an E-MAG on a patient with a T10 spinal cord injury was observed. With the measurement of three-dimensional gait data, a comparison was made between the scenarios of having the knees locked during the entire gait cycle to that of al owing the knees to flex freely during the swing phase, yet stil be locked for stability during stance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Qualitative observation and kinematic three-dimensional gait data demonstrated that this patient ambulated with a faster, more efficient gait pattern when using E-MAG. Despite having no voluntary control of knees, this orthotic option afforded the ability to walk safely and smoothly with both knees flexing during swing and knee lock in stance phase, and with less upper body compensation. Compared with drop ring lock knee-ankle-foot orthosis, E-MAG active orthosis contains stance phase control, so it has higher degree of acceptance and practicality