Abstract:Perceptual learning (PL) can transfer to a new location/hemisphere completely when the new location is additionally trained with an irrelevant task (Xiao et al, 2008). This double-training result, along with additional findings of learning transfer to untrained orientations/directions (Zhang et al., 2010; Zhang & Yang, 2014) suggests that PL is a high-level learning process occurring beyond the retinotopic visual cortex. However, it is unclear why PL is location specific in the first place, and whether bottom-up stimulation of the untrained location during irrelevant training is sufficient to enable learning transfer. In a failed attempt to solve these puzzles, we found that practicing Vernier at one retinal location, with simultaneous passive exposure to additional Vernier stimuli at a diagonal quadrant location, leads to no learning transfer (Wang et al., 2013). However, the impact of passive exposure stimulation might have been suppressed by demanding Vernier practice. Here we used a continuous flashing suppression paradigm to re-investigate the role of location training in double-training enabled learning transfer. Vernier was trained at one quadrant location, and a randomly oriented Gabor was simultaneously shown at a diagonal location. The perception of the Gabor was suppressed by flashing white noise shown in the other eye, and the observers were unaware of the Gabor’s presence. This bottom-up stimulation of untrained location resulted in complete transfer of Vernier learning from the trained location. In a control experiment in which the randomly oriented Gabor was absent while other conditions were unchanged, no learning transfer was evident. These results suggest that bottom-up stimulation of an untrained retinal location can enable transfer of Vernier learning from a trained location. Moreover, location specificity, at least with Vernier learning, may result from under-stimulation of untrained locations. Whether this under-stimulation results from no stimulation or even suppression during training requires further investigation. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

Unconsciously learning task-irrelevant perceptual sequences

The Neural Basis of Implicit Learning of Task-Irrelevant Chinese Tonal Sequence

The Attentional Blink Between Two Color Processing Tasks

Processing of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Faces Impacted by Implicit Sequence Learning

Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning:An Event-related fMRI Study

Learning Without Consciously Knowing: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials in Sequence Learning

Attention is Required for Knowledge-Based Sequential Grouping: Insights from the Integration of Syllables into Words.

Unconscious Reward Facilitates Motion Perceptual Learning

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Implicit spatial sequential learning facilitates attentional selection in covert visual search. An event-related potentials study

Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?

Sequence is Necessary for Multi-Stimulus Perceptual Learning

Task-Irrelevant Context Learned Under Rapid Display Presentation: Selective Attention in Associative Blocking

Reward produces learning of a consciously inaccessible feature

Unconscious Reward Signal Promotes Motion Perceptual Learning

Transfer of statistical learning between tasks.

What is Learned in Perceptual Learning of the Classical Texture Discrimination Task?

Statistical learning of incidental perceptual regularities induces sensory conditioned cortical responses

Under-stimulation at untrained retinal locations may explain location specificity in perceptual learning

Learning how to exploit sources of information

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning