Screening of Chinese Bread Wheat Genotypes under Two Water Regimes by Various Drought Tolerance Indices

Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir,Xiaojie Chen,Long Tian,Anthony G. Condon,Yin‐Gang Hu
2013-01-01
Australian Journal of Crop Science
Abstract:Forty-six Chinese bread wheat ('Triticum aestivum' L.) genotypes were evaluated for two growing seasons (2010-2012), under water-stressed and non-stressed environments, to classify them according to the target environment. The trial was conducted in a rainout shelter to avoid the effect of unpredictable rainfall. The results of combined analysis of variance for grain yield revealed that the effects of environment (E), genotype (G), year (Y) and their interactions were highly significant (P<0.01). Based on the grain yield under water-stressed (Ys) and non-stressed (Yp) environments, several drought tolerance indices comprising of mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI), stress stability index (SSI), tolerance index (TOL), yield index (YI) and yield stability index (YSI) were calculated for each genotype and compared. Grain yield under water-stressed (Ys) and non-stressed (Yp) environments were prositively and significantly correlated with MP, GMP, and STI. Therefore, these indices were considered as a better predictor of Ys and Yp than TOL, SSI and YSI. Principal component analysis classified the genotypes into three groups. The first group contained genotypes with high drought susceptibility that are suitable for non-stressed environments only. The second group consisted of drought tolerant genotypes suitable for stressed environments. The third group included genotypes with low yields in both environments. Cluster analysis classified the genotypes into two groups, viz., drought tolerant with moderate to high yield stability and drought susceptible with high yield under stress-free conditions. MP, GMP and STI were found more effective in screening genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance. Therefore, these indices could be used successfully as selection criteria for the screening of genotypes for performance under various soil moisture levels.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?