Abstract:Background, aim, and scope: We strive to predict consequences of genetically modified plants (GMPs) being cultivated openly in the environment, as human and animal health, biodiversity, agricultural practise and farmers' economy could be affected. Therefore, it is unfortunate that the risk assessment of GMPs is burdened by uncertainty. One of the reasons for the uncertainty is that the GMPs are interacting with the ecosystems at the release site thereby creating variability. This variability, e.g. in gene flow, makes consequence analysis difficult. The review illustrates the great uncertainty of results from gene-flow analysis. Main features: Many independent experiments were performed on the individual processes in gene flow. The results comprise information both from laboratory, growth chambers and field trials, and they were generated using molecular or phenotypic markers and analysis of fitness parameters. Monitoring of the extent of spontaneous introgression in natural populations was also performed. Modelling was used as an additional tool to identify key parameters in gene flow. Results: The GM plant may affect the environment directly or indirectly by dispersal of the transgene. Magnitude of the transgene dispersal will depend on the GM crop, the agricultural practise and the environment of the release site. From case-to-case these three factors provide a variability that is reflected in widely different likelihoods of transgene dispersal and fitness of introgressed plants. In the present review, this is illustrated through a bunch of examples mostly from our own research on oilseed rape, Brassica napus. In the Brassica cases, the variability affected all five main steps in the process of gene dispersal. The modelling performed suggests that in Brassica, differences in fitness among plant genome classes could be a dominant factor in the establishment and survival of introgressed populations. Discussion: Up to now, experimental analyses have mainly focused on studying the many individual processes of gene flow. This can be criticised, as these experiments are normally carried out in widely different environments and with different genotypes, and thus providing bits and pieces difficult to assemble. Only few gene-flow studies have been performed in natural populations and over several plant generations, though this could give a more coherent and holistic view. Conclusion: The variability inherent in the processes of gene flow in Brassica is apparent and remedies are wished for. One possibility is to expose the study species to additional experiments and monitoring, but this is costly and will likely not cover all possible scenarios. Another remedy is modelling gene flow. Modelling is a valuable tool in identifying key factors in the gene-flow process for which more knowledge is needed, and identifying parameters and processes which are relatively insensitive to change and therefore require less attention in future collections of data. But the interdependence between models and experimental data is extensive, as models depend on experimental data for their development or testing. Recommendations: More and more transgenic varieties are being grown worldwide harbouring genes that might potentially affect the environment (e.g. drought tolerance, salt tolerance, disease tolerance, pharmaceutical genes). This calls for a thorough risk assessment. However, in Brassica, the limited and uncertain knowledge on gene flow is an obstacle to this. Modelling of gene flow should be optimised, and modelling outputs verified in targeted field studies and at the landscape level. Last but not least, it is important to remember that transgene flow in itself is not necessarily a thread, but it is the consequences of gene flow that may jeopardise the ecosystems and the agricultural production. This emphasises the importance of consequence analysis of genetically modified plants.

Dissimilarity of Contemporary and Historical Gene Flow in a Wild Carrot (daucus Carota) Metapopulation under Contrasting Levels of Human Disturbance: Implications for Risk Assessment and Management of Transgene Introgression.

Introgression of Transgenic Crop Alleles: Its Evolutionary Impacts on Conserving Genetic Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives

The Transfer of Foreign Genes and Its Expression Products in Genetically Modified Crops

Approaches of Transgenes Escape from Transgenic Plants

Gene Flow, Risk Assessment and the Environmental Release of Transgenic Plants

The variability of processes involved in transgene dispersal-case studies from Brassica and related genera

Gene Flow from Cultivated Rice (oryza Sativa) to Its Weedy and Wild Relatives.

Anthropogenic and natural drivers of gene flow in a temperate wild fruit tree: a basis for conservation and breeding programs in apples

Fitness Correlates Of Crop Transgene Flow Into Weedy Populations: A Case Study Of Weedy Rice In China And Other Examples

Gene Flow from Genetically Modified Rice to Its Wild Relatives: Assessing Potential Ecological Consequences

Global gene flow releases invasive plants from environmental constraints on genetic diversity

Assessing Environmental Impact of Pollen-Mediated Transgene Flow

Non-Random Transmission Of Parental Alleles Into Crop-Wild And Crop-Weed Hybrid Lineages Separated By A Transgene And Neutral Identifiers In Rice

Population Genomics Reveals Gene Flow and Adaptive Signature in Invasive Weed Mikania micrantha

[Gene Dispersal Risk of Transgenic Plants].

[Gene Flow and Its Ecological Risks of Transgenic Oilseed Rape ( Brassica Napus)].

The influence of gene flow on population viability in an isolated urban caracal population

Compensation of Wild Plants Weakens the Effects of Crop-Wild Gene Flow on Wild Rice Populations

An analytical model assessing the potential threat to natural habitats from insect resistance transgenes

High-Resolution Gene Flow Model For Assessing Environmental Impacts Of Transgene Escape Based On Biological Parameters And Wind Speed

Introgression from Cultivated Rice Alters Genetic Structures of Wild Relative Populations: Implications for in Situ Conservation.