Transperitoneal Mini-Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Concomitant Ureteroscopy-Assisted Pyelolithotomy for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Complicated by Renal Caliceal Stones

Zhi Chen,Peng Zhou,Zhong-Qing Yang,Yang Li,Yan-Cheng Luo,Yao He,Nan-Nan Li,Chao-Qun Xie,Chen Lai,Xiao-Long Fang,Xiang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055026
IF: 3.7
2013-01-01
PLoS ONE
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To present our experience of combining transperitoneal mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty (mini-LP) and concomitant ureteroscopy-assisted pyelolithotomy (U-P) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) complicated by renal caliceal stones in the same session.METHODS:Between May 2007 and December 2011, mini-LP and concomitant U-P was performed in nine patients with UPJO and ipsilateral renal caliceal stones. Stone location and burden were preoperatively assessed. After pyelotomy with appropriate length (about 4 mm), a 16-Fr catheter sheath replaced the uppermost or lowermost laparoscopic trocar and was introduced directly into the renal pelvis under the guidance of a guide wire and laparoscopic vision. A 7.5F rigid ureteroscopy passed through the catheter sheath into the plevis. Intracorporeal lithotripsy and/or pressure irrigation via a pump was used for caliceal stone removal. Subsequently, laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performed in a standard fashion. Postoperative imaging was assessed.RESULTS:The calculi sizes ranged from 2 to 11 mm (mean, 7.1 mm) and an average of 3 stones per patient was removed (range, 1 to 6 stones). Complete stone clearance confirmed by postoperative imaging was achieved in all patients. Mean operative time was 210 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 20 mL. Mean hospital stay was 5 days (4-7). Stent was removed after 4-8 weeks. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted during a mean follow-up of 18.5 months (range, 6 to 24 months).CONCLUSIONS:Mini-LP and concomitant U-P are simple and effective alternatives for the simultaneous management of UPJO complicated by coexisting ipsilateral renal caliceal stones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?