Abstract:Identification of site hot spots, also known as the site with promise, black-spots, accident prone locations, or priority investigation locations, is a crucial step to improve the safety performance of roadway network. Due to the public interests in traffic safety, efficient public fund utilization, and needs of professional safety analyses, Hot Spots Identification (HSID) has received much attention. Traditionally, the process of roadway safety improvement is conducted and divided into separate individual stages. This process includes HSID, safety problem diagnosis, selection of potential treatment candidates, and prioritization of treatments based on benefit to cost analysis. As the first and very important step to improve the overall safety within a road network, hot spots identification (HSID) has been the focuses of many research efforts. Among the multitude of identification methods proposed, one of the disagreements remaining unresolved is regarding which kind of criterion should be employed to identify the hot spots, the accident number or the accident reduction potential. Rather than favor either of the criteria, the authors proposed a methodology combining the two criteria to conduct HSID. To improve the identification accuracy, the well accepted empirical Bayesian technique is used to compute the expected accident number and accident reduction potential. In addition, the confidence levels are also adopted to guard against the uncertainties revolving around the estimated values. The confidence level associated with expected accident number is obtained by using the gamma distribution of the expected number of accidents of specific road sites, whereas the confidence level related with accident reduction potential is computed by using the normal distributions. The methodology was applied to four functional classifications of road sections in Arizona. The results have illustrated the great advantages of this methodology over couple of other identification methods.

Kernel Density Estimation Based Method for Hazardous Road Segments Identification

Hotspot identification considering daily variability of traffic flow and crash record: A case study

Comparative analysis of the spatial analysis methods for hotspot identification.

Spatial multiresolution analysis approach to identify crash hotspots and estimate crash risk

Safety Evaluation Method of Freeway Segment Based on the Fuzzy Information Distribution and Risk Assessment

Road Traffic Safety Risk Estimation Method Based on Vehicle Onboard Diagnostic Data

Identification of Hazardous Road Locations for Pedestrians

Identification Method for Crash-Prone Sections of Mountain Highway under Complex Weather Conditions

How to identify hazardous locations in roadway network

A new method to conduct hot spot identification

Spatial Point Analysis of Road Crashes in Shanghai: A GIS-based Network Kernel Density Method

Application of the Empirical Bayes Method with the Finite Mixture Model for Identifying Accident-Prone Spots

Identification of Accident Blackspots on Rural Roads Using Grid Clustering and Principal Component Clustering

Crash Risk As sessment Method for Typical Sections of Rural Roads Using Bayesian Networks

A Spatial Autocorrelation-based Approach for Identifying Hot Spots on Urban Road

Evaluation of Peak over Threshold Approach for Road Safety Estimation

A Crash Risk Identification Method for Freeway Segments with Horizontal Curvature Based on Real-Time Vehicle Kinetic Response

Comparisons on Methods for Identifying Accident Black Spots Using Vehicle Kinetic Parameters Collected from Road Experiments

Evaluating The Safety Risk Of Rural Roadsides Using A Bayesian Network Method

Toward a crowdsourcing solution to identify high-risk highway segments through mining driving jerks

Hotspot Identification of Signalized Intersection Using Empirical Bayes Method