Comparison of clinical efficacy between MPT and MP in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Xue-mei WANG,Jiu-wei CUI,Zhong-ping XIAO,Lin CHEN,Peng GAO,Kun FU,Mei HAN,Guan-jun WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13481/j.1671-587x.2012.05.028
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide regimen (MPT) with melphalan and prednisone regimen (MP) in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods:37 elderly patients newly diagnosed as MM were treated with MPT or MP. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen. MPT group (20 patients): melphalan 4 mg · m-2 · d -1, d 1-7, prednisone 40 mg · m-2 · d -1, d 1-7, thalidomide 100-200 mg · d-1, every 28 d for 1 cycle. MP group (17 patients): the doses of melphalan and prednisone were the same as that in MPT group. The efficacy was evaluated after 4-6 cycles of treatment. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) of the patients in MPT group was significantly higher than that in MP group (65% vs 41.2%, P<0.05). The median time to response in MPT group was shorter than that in MP group (2 months vs 3.5 months, P<0.05). The incidence of grade I-II side effects in MPT group was higher than that in MP group (50% vs 24%, P< 0.05). However, there was no difference in the incidence of grade III-IV side effects between two groups. Conclusion: Compared with MP regimen, the ORR of MPT is significantly increased, the time of response to treatment is markedly shorten. The incidence of adverse reactions is higher in MPT group, but there is no difference in the incidence of grade III-IV side effects between MPT group and MP group, and the patients can tolerate well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?