Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Validation And Psychometric Properties Of Chinese Version Of Sf-36 In Patients With Hypertension, Coronary Heart Diseases, Chronic Gastritis And Peptic Ulcer

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Development And Validation Of A Questionnaire To Assess The Quality Of Life In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease In Mainland China

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SF36 v2 in aging patients with chronic heart failure

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Chinese (simple) Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Application of Chinese version of SF-36 scale and its reliability and validity in patients with chronic Keshan disease

Evaluation of SF-36 instrument with the quality of life in chronic diseases

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Validity and Sensitivity of the SF-6D and EQ-5D in Chinese Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris

Psychometric Properties of Chinese Version SF-36 for Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Oral Cancer

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

Health Related Quality of Life Measured by SF-36: a Population-Based Study in Shanghai, China

The Reliability and Validity of Short Form-36 Questionnaire in Patients with Gout

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in women with breast cancer.

Validation And Clinical Interpretation Of The St George'S Respiratory Questionnaire Among Copd Patients, China

Analysis on reliability and validity of SF-36 scale in urban residents]

Assessment of the Chinese-Version SF-36 in the Chinese Opiate Addicts