Causal Relationship Between Obesity and Vitamin D Status: Bi-Directional Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Multiple Cohorts.
Karani S. Vimaleswaran,Diane J. Berry,Chen Lu,Emmi Tikkanen,Stefan Pilz,Linda T. Hiraki,Jason D. Cooper,Zari Dastani,Rui Li,Denise K. Houston,Andrew R. Wood,Karl Michaelsson,Liesbeth Vandenput,Lina Zgaga,Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong,Mark I. McCarthy,Josee Dupuis,Marika Kaakinen,Marcus E. Kleber,Karen Jameson,Nigel Arden,Olli Raitakari,Jorma Viikari,Kurt K. Lohman,Luigi Ferrucci,Hakan Melhus,Erik Ingelsson,Liisa Byberg,Lars Lind,Mattias Lorentzon,Veikko Salomaa,Harry Campbell,Malcolm Dunlop,Braxton D. Mitchell,Karl-Heinz Herzig,Anneli Pouta,Anna-Liisa Hartikainen,Elizabeth A. Streeten,Evropi Theodoratou,Antti Jula,Nicholas J. Wareham,Claes Ohlsson,Timothy M. Frayling,Stephen B. Kritchevsky,Timothy D. Spector,J. Brent Richards,Terho Lehtimaki,Willem H. Ouwehand,Peter Kraft,Cyrus Cooper,Winfried Maerz,Chris Power,Ruth J. F. Loos,Thomas J. Wang,Marjo-Riitta Jaervelin,John C. Whittaker,Aroon D. Hingorani,Elina Hyppoenen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001383
2013-01-01
PLoS Medicine
Abstract:Background: Obesity is associated with vitamin D deficiency, and both are areas of active public health concern. We explored the causality and direction of the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] using genetic markers as instrumental variables (IVs) in bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.Methods and Findings: We used information from 21 adult cohorts (up to 42,024 participants) with 12 BMI-related SNPs (combined in an allelic score) to produce an instrument for BMI and four SNPs associated with 25(OH) D (combined in two allelic scores, separately for genes encoding its synthesis or metabolism) as an instrument for vitamin D. Regression estimates for the IVs (allele scores) were generated within-study and pooled by meta-analysis to generate summary effects. Associations between vitamin D scores and BMI were confirmed in the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium (n = 123,864). Each 1 kg/m(2) higher BMI was associated with 1.15% lower 25(OH) D (p = 6.52x10(-27)). The BMI allele score was associated both with BMI (p = 6.30x10(-62)) and 25(OH) D (20.06% [95% CI -0.10 to -0.02], p = 0.004) in the cohorts that underwent meta-analysis. The two vitamin D allele scores were strongly associated with 25(OH) D (p <= 8.07x10(-57) for both scores) but not with BMI (synthesis score, p = 0.88; metabolism score, p = 0.08) in the meta-analysis. A 10% higher genetically instrumented BMI was associated with 4.2% lower 25(OH) D concentrations (IV ratio: -4.2 [95% CI -7.1 to -1.3], p = 0.005). No association was seen for genetically instrumented 25(OH) D with BMI, a finding that was confirmed using data from the GIANT consortium (p >= 0.57 for both vitamin D scores).Conclusions: On the basis of a bi-directional genetic approach that limits confounding, our study suggests that a higher BMI leads to lower 25(OH) D, while any effects of lower 25(OH) D increasing BMI are likely to be small. Population level interventions to reduce BMI are expected to decrease the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.