CEUS and ultrasonographic elastography in diagnosing papillary microcarcinoma of thyroid

Min-xia ZENG,Yan WANG,Yan-yan LUAN,Hai-jun DAN,Yi LI,Bing HU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13929/j.1003-3289.2012.06.061
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To assess the value of CEUS and ultrasonographic elastography (UE) in diagnosing papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid (PTMC). Methods: Totally 55 thyroid solitary nodules in 40 patients were detected with conventional ultrasonography but unable to diagnose. Then CEUS and UE examination were performed. The enhancement patterns of nodules were observed, and the hardness of nodules was evaluated with 5-score method. The ultrasonographic results were compared with pathologic findings. The evaluation criterions of CEUS were as following: The time and the pattern of contrast up-take, contrast intensity, contrast-enhancement distribution (homogeneous or inhomogeneous), contrast wash-out early or not. Elasticity score (ES) ≥3 was used for diagnosing PTMC. Results: There was no statistical difference in enhancement patterns between benign and malignant nodules (all P>0.05). The accuracy of UE was higher than that of CEUS in diagnosing PTMC (P<0.001). When using ES ≥3 for the diagnosis of PTMC, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 93.10% (27/29), 76.92% (20/26) and 85.45% (47/55), respectively. Conclusion: CEUS does not improve the characterization of PTMC, while ES ≥3 helps to identify PTMC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?