Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S371635
IF: 2.8319
2022-04-29
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Qi Han, 1 Feifan Meng, 1 Ming Chen, 1 Xiangjun Lu, 1 Deyuan Zhao, 1 Dongze Wu, 1 Tingting Wang, 2 Rujie Qin 1 1 Department of Orthopedics, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Dermatology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Rujie Qin, Department of Orthopedics, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, No. 6 East Zhenhua Road, Haizhou, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, 222061, People's Republic of China, Email Objective: To evaluate the early clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation accompanied by lumbar instability. Methods: From January 2019 to June 2020, a total of 82 consecutive patients were categorised into PE-TLIF group and MIS-TLIF group based on different surgical methods. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, perioperative objective serological index, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to back to work or normal life, and Modified MacNab score were used as the evaluation indexes. The differences between the two groups were analyzed and the clinical effects were compared. Results: The VAS back pain of PE-TLIF group was decreased compared to that of MIS-TLIF group in the postoperative 1 week and 1 month. The operative time in PE-TLIF group was obviously longer than that in MIS-TLIF group. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in PE-TLIF group than that in MIS-TLIF group. More intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage were recorded in MIS-TLIF group. Compared with MIS-TLIF, PE-TLIF surgery was associated with a shorter time to ambulation after surgery and a shorter time to back to work or normal life. Significant statistical differences were observed in IL-6, CRP, and CK on postoperative 3 days between the two groups. Conclusion: For middle-aged and elderly patients, PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF surgery both have obvious clinical efficacy and safety. However, with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter recovery time and less injury to the patients, people undergoing PE-TLIF surgery can return to work or normal life faster. It is speculated that PE-TLIF has a higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than that MIS-TLIF. PE-TLIF may be a better choice for middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation. Keywords: lumbar disc herniation, minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, middle-aged and elderly Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is 1 of the commonest reasons for lower back and leg pain in adults, which seriously affects the health and life quality, and brings a heavy burden on society and families. Low back pain has a lifetime prevalence of 84% 1 and has a high prevalence in middle adulthood and old age, 2 60% of which are also accompanied by leg pain symptoms. 3 Although non‐surgical treatment is the primary treatment for these conditions, those with intractable symptoms may need surgical treatment, especially middle-aged and elderly patients, whose disc, intervertebral ligaments, paravertebral muscle, facet joint cartilage have degenerated, and are usually accompanied by lumbar instability, discectomy combined with spinal fusion is a better choice. 4 When traditional open surgery was used for the treatment of patients with LDH, the operative incision needed to be lengthened, which may result in greater surgical trauma, as well as increased bleeding and infection risk. 5,6 Spinal stability was also reduced after lumbar laminectomy. These increased surgery traumas have a greater influence on middle-aged and older patients. Therefore, spine surgeons are accompanied by great challenges in reducing the surgical trauma for patients with LDH and decreasing perioperative complications, as well as enhancing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Against this backdrop, minimally invasive procedures are receiving increasing attention in the field of spine surgery. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF), which evolved from percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) technology, is 1 of the recently-developed minimall -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology