A Clinical Study of Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering with Cultured Autogenous Periosteal Cells: Coordinated Activation of Bone Formation and Resorption

Masaki Nagata,Hideyuki Hoshina,Minqi Li,Megumi Arasawa,Kohya Uematsu,Shin Ogawa,Kazuho Yamada,Tomoyuki Kawase,Kenji Suzuki,Akira Ogose,Ichiro Fuse,Kazuhiro Okuda,Katsumi Uoshima,Koh Nakata,Hiromasa Yoshie,Ritsuo Takagi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.631
IF: 4.626
2012-01-01
Bone
Abstract:In ongoing clinical research into the use of cultured autogenous periosteal cells (CAPCs) in alveolar bone regeneration, CAPCs were grafted into 33 sites (15 for alveolar ridge augmentation and 18 for maxillary sinus lift) in 25 cases. CAPCs were cultured for 6weeks, mixed with particulate autogenous bone and platelet-rich plasma, and then grafted into the sites. Clinical outcomes were determined from high-resolution three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images and histological findings. No serious adverse events were attributable to the use of grafted CAPCs. Bone regeneration was satisfactory even in cases of advanced atrophy of the alveolar process. Bone biopsy after bone grafting with CAPCs revealed prominent recruitment of osteoblasts and osteoclasts accompanied by angiogenesis around the regenerated bone. 3D-CT imaging suggested that remodeling of the grafted autogenous cortical bone particles was faster in bone grafting with CAPCs than in conventional bone grafting. The use of CAPCs offers cell-based bone regeneration therapy, affording complex bone regeneration across a wide area, and thus expanding the indications for dental implants. Also, it enables the content of particulate autogenous bone in the graft material to be reduced to as low as 40%, making the procedure less invasive, or enabling larger amounts of graft materials to be prepared. It may also be possible to dispense with the use of autogenous bone altogether in the future. The results suggest that CAPC grafting induces bone remodeling, thereby enhancing osseointegration and consequently reducing postoperative waiting time after dental implant placement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?