Abstract:Objective To discuss the role of preoperative abdominal 3 D-CT assessment in the selection of entry point region and the range of puncture horizontal angle for nonprolapsed lumbar disc herniation treated with endoscopic transforaminal approach and Half-Half technique to provide more comprehensive and precise clinical reference data for percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy ( PETD ) technology and to study the effectiveness and safety of imaging parameters measured preoperatively for guiding the clinical practice of PETD. Methods The imaging data of 65 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with endoscopic transforaminal approach were analyzed from August 2014 to October 2015 retrospectively. Preoperative abdominal 3 D-CT, lumbar 3 D-CT, and lumbar MRI were included. Preoperative radiographic evaluation via abdominal 3 D-CT included the diseased disc segments, distance from the entry point to the spinous process ( D1 ), distance from the spinous to the ventral margin of the facet level connection with skin ( D2 ), angle between the puncture path in the axial plane of the body and horizontal line ( α ), the least puncture angle which would avoid injury to any abdominal organ, and would not be obstructed by the facet joints ( β ). The imaging parameters measured were used for guiding the clinical practice of PETD, and were judged whether able to achieve the desired objectives combined with intraoperative puncture position. The ratio of the safety and efifcacy was also calculated.Results Measurement of distances from the entry point to the spinous process in preoperative abdominal CT ( D1 ) was 8.4 - 10.9 cm, 9.6 - 12.7 cm, 11.1 - 14.3 cm, 12.4 - 15.7 cm and 13.6 - 15.9 cm at L1-2 - L5 - S1 respectively. They increased when target segments decreased. There were statistically significant differences in D1 and D2 between different BMI (P < 0.05 ). And at L1-2 - L5 - S1 the mean D2 were 12.2 - 15.9 cm, 12.7 - 16.3 cm, 13.4 - 17.6 cm, 14.9 - 18.4 cm and 15.1 - 18.5 cm respectively. The results demonstrated that angles between the puncture path in cross-section of the body and horizontal line ( α ) at L1-2 - L5 - S1 were 17° - 29°, 14° - 25°, 11° - 22°, 6° - 18°, 6° - 13°. There were no statistically signiifcant differences in angle α between different BMI (P > 0.05 ). The least puncture angles in the supine position were approximately 13° - 16° at L1-2, 7° - 13° at L2-3 and 2° - 5° at L3-4 on each side, decreasing to 2° - 4° at L4-5 and 0° - 2° at L5 - S1.According to the entry point region and the range of puncture horizontal angle designed preoperatively, the ratio of the safety and efifcacy were about 100%.Conclusions Preoperative abdominal CT is helpful in determining the safe and effective entry point region and puncture angle. Adequate preoperative imaging assessment is the basis for the development of personalized surgical potocol, and the fundamental requirement for transforaminal endoscopic surgery, and it can improve surgical safety, success rate and clinical effects significantly. In addition, for the lower lumbar spine, horizontal angle of 10° - 15° is safe and more effective.

Comparison on Lumbar Disk Puncture Between Posteromedial Approach and Posterolateral Approach under MR Guidance

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

THE STUDY ON IMAGING ANATOMY OF APPROACH IN PERCUTANEOUS LUMBAR DISC MINIMALLY INVASIVE OPERATION

Open MRI guidance and monitoring lumbar disc discography

The Mechanism and Therapeutic Effect of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Foramen Puncture on Neuropathic Pain Based on Digital Medical Technology

The long-term therapeutic effect of central lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: a comparison between microendoscopy discectomy and percutaneous lumbar discectomy

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Epidural Access Using Paramedian Transverse Scanning with the Needle In-Plane: a Comparison with Paramedian Saggital Scanning

Puncture and localization for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with C-arm navigation: a randomized controlled cadaver trial

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy <i>via</i> the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC DISCECTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF L_5/S_1 DISC HERNIATION VIA INTERLAMINAR APPROACH ASSISED BY MYELOGRAPHY

Volume Navigation with Fusion of Real-Time Ultrasound and CT Images to Guide Posterolateral Transforaminal Puncture in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

A retropective study of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for no prolapsed lumbar disc herniation：selection of entry point region

Application Value of Ultrasound Combined with X-ray Localization in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Feasibility and clinic application of percutaneous lateral endoscopic discectomy

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5–S1 Disc Herniation Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus a Transforaminal Approach

Can the Novel Lumbo-Iliac Triangle Technique Based on Biplane Oblique Fluoroscopy Facilitate Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Patients with L5-S1 Disc Herniation Combined with High Iliac Crest? A Case-Control Study of 100 Patients

Prognosis Evaluation of MRI Combined with Magnetic Resonance Myelography on Lumbar Disc Herniation after Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy

Comparison of Surgical Invasiveness Between Microdiscectomy and 3 Different Endoscopic Discectomy Techniques for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus a Transforaminal Approach: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study With 2-Year Follow Up.

The Strategy and Early Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar or Extraforaminal Approach for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated with Percutaneous Discectomy: Comparative Study with Microendoscopic Discectomy