A comprehensive guide on the optimal timing of PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome: An updated meta-analysis
Ahmed Abdelaziz,Hanaa Elsayed,Karim Atta,Ahmed Mechi,Hallas Kadhim,Aya Moustafa Aboutaleb,Ahmed Elaraby,Mohamed Hatem Ellabban,Mahmoud Eid,Hadeer Elsaeed AboElfarh,Rahma AbdElfattah Ibrahim,Emad Addin Zawaneh,Mahmoud Ezzat,Mohamed Abdelaziz,Abdelrahman Hafez,Ahmed Mahmoud,Hazem S. Ghaith,Mustafa Suppah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131774
IF: 4.039
2024-01-11
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Background Invasive revascularization is recommended for cohorts of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, the optimal timing of invasive revascularization is still controversial and no defined consensus is established. We aim to give a comprehensive appraisal on the optimal timing of invasive strategy in the heterogenous population of ACS. Methods Relevant studies were assessed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Library from inception until April 2023. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were our primary outcomes of interest, other secondary outcomes were cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. The data was pooled as odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random effect model using STATA 17 MP. Results A total of 26 studies comprising 21,443 patients were included in the analysis. Early intervention was favor to decrease all-cause mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.98, p = 0.03), when compared to delayed intervention. Subgroup analysis showed that early intervention was significantly associated with all-cause mortality reduction in only NSTE-ACS (OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.7 to 0.99], p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between early and delayed intervention in terms of MACE, cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. Conclusion An early intervention was associated with lower mortality rates compared to delayed intervention in NSTE-ACS with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415574.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems