CO<sub>2</sub>-switchable viscoelastic surfactants.
Yujun Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21748/wsym9645
2022-01-01
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society
Abstract:Smart surfactants especially CO2-switchable viscoelastic surfactants (VES) have received considerable interest owing to their peculiar wormlike micellar structure and tunable rheological response, as well as the benign CO2 trigger for switching wormlike micelles (WLMs) between an “on” and “off” state without compromising their inherent behaviors [1]. In our laboratory, three types of surfactants were separately used to develop CO2-switchable VES: a “pseudo”-gemini surfactant composed of sodium dodecyl sulfate and N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,3-propanediamine with molar ratio of 2:1 [2], a long-chain polyamine, octadecyl dipropylene triamine [3], and an ultra-long-chain tertiary amine, N-erucamidopropyl-N,N-dimethylamine [4]. Before introducing CO2, all these surfactant solutions are low-viscosity emulsion-like fluid; upon bubbling CO2 for less than 2 minutes, however, they immediately transform into transparent viscoelastic gels with viscosity thousands times higher than the original solution. When CO2 is displaced with N2 or air, the gels recover their initial low-viscous cloudy state. Of special interest is that such a CO2-responsive behavior is reversible when cyclically streaming and removing CO2, and could be repeated several cycles without loss of response. Cryo-TEM visualization of surfactant solutions before and after CO2 treatment reveals a microstructural transition from spherical micelles to WLMs, and NMR elucidation of the corresponding species attributes the mechanism to the protonation and deprotonation of the corresponding amine groups in the systems. The advantage to use CO2 as a trigger over traditional HCl is no contamination and accumulation of by-products in the solution, which prolongs the switchable cycles. These features furnish CO2-switchable VES to thicken specific fluids for a myriad of industrial applications, particularly CO2 enhanced oil recovery process. References [1] Z. Chu, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 7174. [2] Y. Zhang, et al. Langmuir, 2013, 29, 4187. [3] Y. Zhang, et al. Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4902. [4] Y. Zhang, et al. Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 6217.